Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) vs Oppo Find X3 Neo: A Clash of Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) edges out the Find X3 Neo thanks to its superior Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering noticeably better performance. While the Find X3 Neo boasts fast charging, the Reno6 Pro’s endurance rating and overall power make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 09 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | CPH2247 | CPH2207 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Superior Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- Exceptional 108h Endurance Rating
- Bright Display (780 nits)
- 65W Fast Charging
- Design may be less distinctive than Find X3 Neo
- Specific camera details are lacking
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Fast 65W Charging (35 min to 100%)
- Sleek Design
- Good Overall Performance (Snapdragon 865)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 865)
- Lower Endurance Rating
- Display brightness not specified
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the Reno6 Pro 5G's measured 780 nits peak brightness gives it a slight advantage in outdoor visibility. The Find X3 Neo's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors, typical of AMOLED technology. Both offer smooth scrolling thanks to high refresh rates (likely 90Hz or 120Hz, though specific refresh rates are not provided).
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area. Both phones are expected to deliver excellent image quality, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Reno6 Pro 5G likely benefits from Oppo's latest camera optimizations. Both phones likely feature versatile camera systems with wide, ultrawide, and potentially telephoto lenses. Video recording capabilities are also expected to be strong on both devices.
Performance
The Reno6 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 870 is a significant upgrade over the Find X3 Neo's Snapdragon 865. The 870 offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. While the 865 is still a capable chip, the 870 provides a more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G's impressive 108-hour endurance rating is a major selling point. While the Find X3 Neo offers incredibly fast 65W charging (100% in 35 minutes), the Reno6 Pro 5G's superior battery capacity and efficiency provide significantly longer usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is ideal for users prioritizing performance, smooth gaming, and long battery life. The Oppo Find X3 Neo is a good fit for those who value fast charging and a slightly more compact design, but are less concerned about raw processing power.