Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 20 Pro: A Snapdragon Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G edges out the Motorola Edge 20 Pro thanks to its significantly faster charging and slightly brighter display. While both offer excellent performance, the Reno6 Pro's charging speed and display brightness provide a more premium feel. The Edge 20 Pro shines with its slightly longer endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 09 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | CPH2247 | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Faster 65W Charging
- Brighter Display (780 nits)
- Potentially smoother 90Hz refresh rate
- Good video stabilization
- Software (ColorOS) may not appeal to everyone
- Slightly lower battery endurance than Edge 20 Pro
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Longer Battery Endurance (112h)
- Clean Android Experience (My UX)
- Potentially higher resolution main camera sensor
- Competitive price
- Slower 30W Charging
- Less bright display (673 nits)
- Software updates can be slower
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, noticeably brighter than the Edge 20 Pro's 673 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. While both displays are AMOLED, the Reno6 Pro's higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. The Reno6 Pro also often features a smoother 90Hz refresh rate, though this can vary by region.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. The Reno6 Pro 5G typically features a versatile camera system with a focus on portrait photography and video stabilization. The Edge 20 Pro often includes a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better zoom capabilities. Image quality will depend on specific lighting conditions and user preferences. Both phones are capable of capturing excellent photos and videos, but their strengths lie in different areas.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 870, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless app navigation on both devices. Real-world performance differences will be minimal, with both handling demanding tasks with ease. Software optimization might play a role, with Oppo's ColorOS potentially offering more features, while Motorola's My UX aims for a cleaner, more stock Android experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 112 hours compared to the Reno6 Pro 5G's 108 hours. However, the Reno6 Pro 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times, while the Edge 20 Pro is limited to 30W. This means the Reno6 Pro can be fully charged much quicker.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a great choice for those seeking long battery life and a clean Android experience, especially if charging speed isn't a top concern.