Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G edges out the Oppo Reno6 Lite thanks to its superior chipset (5G connectivity!), brighter display, and longer software support. While the Reno6 Lite boasts faster charging, the A23 5G's overall package provides better value and future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 17 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 17 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | CPH2365 | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Sleek Design
- Good Value
- No 5G Connectivity
- Older Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Longer Software Support (Samsung's promise)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Potentially Less Premium Design
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G takes the display crown. While both offer a 1328:1 contrast ratio, the A23 5G's measured 508 nits peak brightness is noticeably higher than the Reno6 Lite's, resulting in better visibility outdoors. Both use a similar resolution, but the A23 5G's brightness advantage is significant.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective, but the A23 5G likely holds an advantage due to Samsung's image processing and potentially better hardware. Both phones offer decent camera systems for their price range, but the A23 5G's software optimizations and potentially higher resolution sensors give it an edge. Detailed camera specs are missing, so a full comparison would require testing.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is a clear winner here. Its 6nm process offers improved efficiency and performance compared to the Reno6 Lite's 11nm Snapdragon 662. The A23 5G also supports 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Reno6 Lite. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the A23 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A23 5G claiming an endurance rating of 138 hours. While the Reno6 Lite's 33W charging is faster, the A23 5G's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset likely result in comparable real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is ideal for those seeking 5G connectivity, a brighter display, and a longer software update commitment.