Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Oppo Reno8 T 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is the clear winner, offering a faster 5G chipset, significantly quicker charging, and a more modern processor. While the Reno6 Lite is a solid budget option, the Reno8 T 5G's upgrades make it the better overall choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Lite | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 17 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 17 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2365 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Stylish Design
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Camera
- Older Chipset
- Slower Charging
- No 5G
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Improved Performance
- Modern Chipset
- Slightly Higher Price
- 60Hz Refresh Rate (common in this price range)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.4-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate. While the resolution is likely similar (FHD+), the Reno8 T 5G's newer chipset might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness. The Reno6 Lite's display is perfectly adequate, but the Reno8 T 5G has a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a similar main camera setup (around 64MP), the Reno8 T 5G's newer image processing capabilities should result in slightly better photos, especially in low light. The Reno6 Lite's camera is still capable, but the Reno8 T 5G offers a more refined experience. Both likely have a depth sensor and macro lens.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno8 T 5G is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 662 in the Reno6 Lite. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Reno8 T 5G. The 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Reno8 T 5G's 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, fully charging the phone in just 44 minutes. The Reno6 Lite's 33W charging is still respectable, but takes considerably longer. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 4500mAh), but the Reno8 T 5G's faster charging gives it a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is perfect for those who want 5G connectivity, faster charging, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more.