Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with a focus on camera capabilities. The Reno6 Lite and Reno7 Lite are two popular options, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 Lite emerges as the clear winner thanks to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. While the Reno6 Lite remains a decent budget option, the Reno7 Lite offers a noticeable upgrade in performance and features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 17 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 17 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | CPH2365 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Sleek design
- Decent camera
- Affordable price
- Older chipset
- Lower brightness display
- Slower charging
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Brighter display
- 5G connectivity
- Faster charging
- Slightly higher price
- Infinite contrast ratio is nominal
Display Comparison
The Reno7 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display at 657 nits (measured) compared to the Reno6 Lite, offering better visibility in sunlight. While both have similar display technology (likely AMOLED), the Reno7 Lite's increased brightness provides a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Reno7 Lite is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data, but suggests excellent blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar camera setups (likely a 64MP main sensor), but the Reno7 Lite's improved image processing capabilities, thanks to the newer chipset, should result in slightly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable, but the Reno7 Lite might offer slightly improved stabilization.
Performance
The Reno7 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Reno6 Lite's Snapdragon 662. The 6nm process offers improved efficiency and performance. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno7 Lite. The CPU architecture differences also contribute to the Reno7 Lite's advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones have a similar battery capacity (likely around 4500mAh) and offer 33W fast charging. However, the Reno7 Lite's charging speeds are faster, reaching 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes, compared to the Reno6 Lite's 54% in 30 minutes. Both phones boast an endurance rating of 125h, suggesting similar battery life under moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and decent camera performance without needing 5G connectivity. The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for users who want a faster processor, a brighter display, 5G capabilities, and quicker charging speeds, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 Lite worth the extra money?
Yes, the Reno7 Lite offers a significant upgrade in performance and features, making it worth the extra investment for most users.
❓ Does the Reno6 Lite support 5G?
No, the Reno6 Lite does not support 5G connectivity.
❓ What is the battery life like on both phones?
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting all-day usage under moderate conditions.