Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Oppo Reno5 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 765G chipset, faster 65W charging, and 5G capabilities. While the Reno6 Lite is more affordable, the Reno5 5G delivers a significantly better overall experience for those prioritizing performance and future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Lite | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 17 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 17 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2365 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Decent camera for everyday use
- 33W fast charging
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- No 5G connectivity
- Slower charging compared to Reno5 5G
Oppo Reno5 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Faster Snapdragon 765G processor
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- 65W SuperVOOC charging
- Excellent battery life
- More expensive
- Older model (potential software update limitations)
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G boasts a brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 634 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno6 Lite's display is adequate, it lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. The Reno5 5G also touts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and richer colors, though this is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno5 5G likely has a slight edge due to the more powerful processor assisting with image processing. Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are missing and would require further investigation. Expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Reno5 5G might handle low-light scenarios slightly better.
Performance
The Snapdragon 765G in the Reno5 5G is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 662 in the Reno6 Lite. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 5G. The Reno6 Lite is sufficient for basic tasks but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Reno5 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Reno6 Lite's battery life is respectable, it doesn't match the longevity of the Reno5 5G. Furthermore, the Reno5 5G's 65W charging is significantly faster than the Reno6 Lite's 33W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and decent camera performance for everyday use. The Oppo Reno5 5G is a better choice for users who want 5G connectivity, faster charging, and a more powerful processor for gaming and demanding tasks.