Oppo's budget smartphone lineup is consistently strong, offering impressive features at competitive prices. The Reno6 Lite and A96 are two popular contenders, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down their key differences to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A96 edges out the Reno6 Lite thanks to its more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset, slightly faster charging, and reverse wired charging. While both offer good value, the A96 provides a more polished and future-proof experience, especially for those prioritizing performance and battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 17 | 2022, March 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Starry Black, Sunset Blue |
| Models | CPH2365 | CPH2333 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 560 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Sleek design
- Compact form factor
- Decent camera
- Older chipset
- Slightly slower charging
- Less efficient
Oppo A96
- More efficient chipset
- Faster charging (with PD)
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly brighter display
- Larger footprint
- Camera processing can sometimes be over-saturated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate and a Full HD+ resolution. While the quality is similar, the A96's slightly brighter panel might offer a marginally better viewing experience in direct sunlight. The Reno6 Lite has a slightly smaller footprint, which some may find more comfortable to hold.
Camera Comparison
The Reno6 Lite typically features a 50MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The A96 boasts a 48MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. While megapixels aren't everything, the A96's image processing tends to be slightly more refined, producing more natural-looking photos. Both offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
The Oppo A96's Snapdragon 680 (6nm) offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno6 Lite's Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 680 is more efficient, resulting in smoother multitasking and better sustained performance during demanding tasks. Gaming performance will also be better on the A96.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery. However, the A96's more efficient chipset and 33W charging (with PD support) allow it to charge slightly faster (50% in 26 minutes vs 54% in 30 minutes for the Reno6 Lite) and potentially offer slightly better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno6 Lite? Users prioritizing a sleek design and a slightly more compact form factor might prefer the Reno6 Lite. Who should buy the Oppo A96? Those seeking better performance, slightly improved battery life, and the added convenience of reverse wired charging will find the A96 a better fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A96 worth the extra money compared to the Reno6 Lite?
Yes, the A96's improved performance and charging speed make it a worthwhile upgrade, especially if you prioritize a smoother user experience and longer battery life.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo A96 has significantly better gaming performance due to its more powerful and efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset.
