Choosing between the Oppo Reno5 Z and Reno5 5G can be tricky. Both offer stylish designs and solid features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner, boasting significantly faster charging (65W vs 30W), a more powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset, and a brighter display. While the Reno5 Z offers a decent experience, the Reno5 5G provides a superior overall package for those prioritizing performance and speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 04 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 04 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2211 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 109h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 317762(v8)
GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Z
- Stylish Design
- Smooth Everyday Performance
- Good Value
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Dimmer Display
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Brighter Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 634 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno5 Z's display is adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno5 5G likely has a slight edge due to the Snapdragon 765G's image processing capabilities. Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing, making a definitive comparison difficult. Expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Reno5 5G might handle low-light scenarios slightly better.
Performance
The Snapdragon 765G in the Reno5 5G provides a noticeable performance boost over the Dimensity 800U in the Reno5 Z. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 5G. The Reno5 Z is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes, compared to the Reno5 Z's 30W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 Z is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and smooth everyday performance. The Oppo Reno5 5G is best suited for users who demand faster charging, better performance for gaming and demanding apps, and a brighter, more vibrant display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 Z worth buying?
The Reno5 Z is a good option if you're on a budget and prioritize a stylish design and smooth performance for everyday tasks. However, if you need faster charging and better performance, the Reno5 5G is a better choice.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno5 5G support 5G?
Yes, as the name suggests, the Oppo Reno5 5G supports 5G connectivity, offering faster download and upload speeds where 5G networks are available.
