Choosing between two similar phones can be tough. The Oppo Reno5 Z and Oppo A95 5G both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A95 5G edges out the Reno5 Z thanks to its 5G connectivity and slightly faster charging. Both phones share the same processor, but the A95 5G's added features and future-proofing make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 04 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 04 | Available. Released 2021, May 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver |
| Models | CPH2211 | PELM00 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | - |
Oppo Reno5 Z
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially slightly better camera processing
- 120Hz AMOLED display
- Slower charging
- No 5G connectivity
- Less future-proof
Oppo A95 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Faster charging (advertised 48 min)
- Future-proof chipset
- Larger battery capacity
- Slightly less premium design
- Camera processing may not be as refined as Reno5 Z
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Reno5 Z might have a slightly more refined color calibration, but the difference is minimal. Resolution is FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Reno5 Z generally has a slightly better reputation for camera processing, producing more natural-looking photos. It features a 48MP main camera, 8MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro lens. The A95 5G has a 48MP main camera, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. Video recording capabilities are similar on both.
Performance
Powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset and Octa-core CPU, performance is largely identical in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and decent gaming performance at medium settings. The A95 5G's 5G modem does add a bit of overhead, but it's not noticeable in most scenarios.
Battery Life
The A95 5G boasts a larger 4,000mAh battery compared to the Reno5 Z's 4,320mAh (though the difference is negligible in practice). More importantly, the A95 5G's 30W charging is advertised to reach 100% in 48 minutes, while the Reno5 Z's charging speed is not as explicitly stated, but is generally slower.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 Z is a good choice for users prioritizing a sleek design and a slightly more refined camera experience, especially if 5G isn't a necessity. The Oppo A95 5G is ideal for those wanting 5G connectivity, faster charging, and a more future-proof device, even if it means a slightly less premium feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A95 5G worth the extra cost over the Reno5 Z?
If 5G connectivity and faster charging are important to you, then yes. The A95 5G offers future-proofing and a more convenient charging experience.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer similar gaming performance due to the same chipset. Expect decent performance at medium settings in most games.