The Oppo Reno5 Z and Motorola Moto G100S represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Reno5 Z leverages MediaTek's Dimensity 800U, while the Moto G100S opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6s Gen 4. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, alongside other key features, to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a potentially smoother software experience, the Motorola Moto G100S emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge and better thermal headroom despite similar clock speeds. Both phones offer 30W charging, making battery concerns less critical.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 04 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 04 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | CPH2211 | - |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 Z
- Potentially better camera software optimization (based on Oppo's history)
- Likely AMOLED display for vibrant colors
- Established brand recognition
- Older Dimensity 800U chipset
- 7nm process less efficient than 4nm
- Potentially more software bloat
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm)
- Cortex-A78 cores for improved performance
- Cleaner Android experience (typically Motorola)
- Potentially IPS LCD display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
- Less established camera software reputation
- May receive fewer software updates than Oppo
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno5 Z's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel, known for vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Moto G100S, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize an IPS LCD. The absence of refresh rate data is notable; a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) would significantly enhance the user experience. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, a factor not specified.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the Reno5 Z, historically, has focused on camera software enhancements, potentially offering better image processing. The Moto G100S’s image quality will heavily rely on the main sensor’s size and aperture. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. The Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally strong, but software optimization is key.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G100S’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture with Cortex-A78 cores, offering a performance advantage over the Oppo Reno5 Z’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). While both CPUs feature peak clock speeds of 2.4 GHz, the A78 cores in the Snapdragon are inherently more efficient and powerful. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon further enhances efficiency, reducing heat generation and potentially minimizing throttling during prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. The Reno5 Z’s Dimensity 800U, while capable, is an older generation chipset. RAM speed (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR5) is not specified, but faster RAM would benefit the Snapdragon's performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, suggesting comparable charging speeds – likely around 60-70 minutes for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process should result in better power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity compared to the Reno5 Z. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Moto G100S has a slight advantage due to its more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Z if you prioritize a brand with a strong track record in camera software and are comfortable with potentially more software customization. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, value the efficiency of the 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 for sustained performance, and want a phone that may receive more timely security updates given Motorola's recent commitments.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G100S handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to adjust graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. The 4nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for sustained performance during gaming sessions, but it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno5 Z support 5G connectivity?
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset in the Oppo Reno5 Z *does* support 5G connectivity. However, 5G availability and performance will vary depending on your carrier and location. Ensure your region supports the 5G bands compatible with the Reno5 Z.
❓ How significant is the difference in efficiency between the 7nm and 4nm fabrication processes?
The move from 7nm to 4nm represents a substantial improvement in power efficiency. A smaller process node allows for more transistors to be packed into the same area, resulting in lower power consumption and reduced heat generation. This translates to longer battery life and less performance throttling under sustained load, giving the Moto G100S an advantage.
