Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 III: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and rapid replenishment, the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. Its 65W charging is significantly faster than the Xperia 1 III’s 30W, and it delivers strong performance with the Snapdragon 865. However, the Xperia 1 III’s Snapdragon 888 and refined camera system appeal to power users and content creators.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 24 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | PDRM00, PDRT00 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
- Significantly faster 65W wired charging
- Strong performance with Snapdragon 865
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Lacks wireless charging
- Limited camera details available
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Newer Snapdragon 888 chipset for improved performance and efficiency
- Professional-grade camera system with advanced features
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Higher price point
- May experience thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 III boasts a 620 nit peak brightness, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno5 Pro+’s display specs aren’t explicitly stated, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Xperia 1 III’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a true black level, typical of OLED technology. The Xperia 1 III’s display is geared towards content consumption, while the Reno5 Pro+ likely prioritizes color vibrancy and responsiveness. The lack of refresh rate information for the Reno5 Pro+ is a notable omission, potentially impacting its smoothness compared to the Xperia 1 III, which is expected to have a 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong camera capabilities, but the Xperia 1 III likely holds an edge. While both are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Xperia 1 III benefits from the newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, enabling improved image processing and computational photography features. Sensor sizes and lens apertures are not specified, but Sony’s expertise in camera sensors suggests a more sophisticated system in the Xperia 1 III. The Reno5 Pro+ likely focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready images, while the Xperia 1 III aims for a more natural and professional look. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno5 Pro+ makes a precise comparison difficult.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), while the Sony Xperia 1 III features the Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 5nm process of the 888 offers improved power efficiency and transistor density compared to the 7nm+ process of the 865. Both CPUs share a similar core configuration (1x Cortex-A77/X1, 3x Cortex-A77/A78, 4x Cortex-A55), but the 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core provides a performance uplift. The Xperia 1 III will exhibit better sustained performance under heavy load due to its more efficient chipset and likely superior thermal design. The Reno5 Pro+ will still deliver excellent performance for most tasks, but may experience more throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 35 minutes, a significant advantage. The Sony Xperia 1 III’s 30W wired charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%, implying a longer full charge time. The Xperia 1 III also supports wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Reno5 Pro+’s specifications. The Reno5 Pro+'s faster charging is a key differentiator for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G if you need a phone that can go from zero to full charge in under 40 minutes, and you value a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks and gaming. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize a more advanced camera system with professional video capabilities, and you’re willing to trade charging speed for the benefits of the newer Snapdragon 888 chipset and its associated improvements in image processing and sustained performance.