Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Realme GT 5G: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT 5G offers a better value proposition. The Snapdragon 888 provides a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in demanding tasks, and the 65W charging is equally rapid on both. While both achieve a 100% charge in 35 minutes, the GT’s newer chipset justifies its position as the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Realme GT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 24 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, March 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (Glass) / 9.1 mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Gold/Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PDRM00, PDRT00 | RMX2202 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 703986 (v8), 810433 (v9) GeekBench: 3555 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
- Proven Snapdragon 865 stability
- Potentially more refined camera processing
- Fast 65W charging
- Older chipset architecture
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 888
- Display brightness not specified
Realme GT 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Higher peak display brightness (650 nits)
- Fast 65W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera potentially optimized for speed over quality
- Newer chipset may have more software bugs initially
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays capable of infinite contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. However, the Realme GT 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 650 nits, suggesting a more visible screen in direct sunlight compared to the Reno5 Pro+, where peak brightness isn't specified. While both likely employ high refresh rates (a common feature in this segment), the GT’s higher brightness gives it an edge for outdoor usability. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as power efficient as on newer flagships.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Reno5 Pro+’s brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on image quality and processing, potentially offering more refined results. The GT, being a more gaming-focused device, might prioritize speed and responsiveness over absolute image fidelity. The absence of details regarding OIS and lens apertures makes a precise comparison impossible, but the Reno5 Pro+’s heritage suggests a more comprehensive camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT 5G’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo Reno5 Pro+’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 888 features the Cortex-X1 prime core, offering substantial performance gains over the 865’s Cortex-A77. While both share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the 888’s A78 performance cores are also superior. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in games. However, the 5nm process, while more efficient, can lead to thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential drawback for extended gaming sessions on the GT. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the GT’s chipset is better equipped to leverage its bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 98 hours and 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 35 minutes. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). The Snapdragon 888 in the GT is theoretically less power-efficient than the 865 in the Reno5 Pro+, but the optimized software and aggressive power management likely mitigate this difference. The identical charging speeds mean neither device suffers from significant downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G if you prioritize a proven, thermally stable flagship experience and are finding it at a significantly discounted price. Its Snapdragon 865 remains capable for most tasks. Buy the Realme GT 5G if you demand the highest possible Android performance for gaming or intensive applications, and want a more modern chipset with future-proofing, even if it means potentially managing some thermal throttling under sustained load.