Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera capabilities and long-term software support, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the better choice. While the Reno5 Pro+ offers incredibly fast 65W charging and a capable Snapdragon 865, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip and superior display brightness deliver a more refined and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 24 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PDRM00, PDRT00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
- Incredibly fast 65W wired charging
- Strong Snapdragon 865 performance
- More neutral image processing
- Older chipset, potentially limited software support
- Display not as bright as Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Google Tensor chip with AI capabilities
- Superior camera with computational photography
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an estimated (based on market data for similar panels) 600-700 nits on the Reno5 Pro+. While both offer excellent color accuracy, the Pixel 6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (typical of OLED) provides deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size also contributes to a more expansive visual experience. The Reno5 Pro+ likely utilizes a standard 120Hz OLED panel, while the Pixel 6 Pro’s panel may incorporate LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, potentially improving battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a major differentiator. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor chip, delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Features like Magic Eraser and Face Unblur are exclusive to the Pixel 6 Pro. The Reno5 Pro+ features a capable camera system, but relies more on hardware than software processing. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing prioritizes dynamic range and detail, while the Reno5 Pro+ aims for a more natural look. The Reno5 Pro+’s camera likely excels in video recording, leveraging the Snapdragon 865’s ISP capabilities.
Performance
The Google Tensor chip, fabricated on a 5nm process, represents a shift in Google’s strategy, focusing on AI and machine learning tasks. While the Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) in the Reno5 Pro+ delivers strong raw CPU and GPU performance, the Tensor chip excels in areas like voice recognition and image processing. The Pixel 6 Pro’s CPU configuration, with 2x Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz, offers a slight edge in peak performance over the Reno5 Pro+'s 1x Cortex-A77 at 2.84 GHz. However, the Snapdragon 865’s Adreno 650 GPU is a proven performer, and the Reno5 Pro+ may offer a smoother experience in graphically demanding games at lower settings. Thermal management is a key consideration; the Tensor chip has been known to throttle under sustained load, while the Snapdragon 865 is generally more efficient.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified in the provided data). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno5 Pro+’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 35 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W charging, which takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 6 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features the Reno5 Pro+ also supports with reverse wired charging, providing added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G if you need exceptionally fast charging – its 65W wired charging is significantly quicker than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W. It’s also ideal for users who prefer a more neutral, less computationally-heavy image processing style. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prioritize computational photography, AI-powered features like Magic Eraser, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google. It’s the better option for those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem and value a brighter, more vibrant display.