Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance, software support, and camera consistency, the iPhone 13 Pro Max remains the superior choice. However, the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G offers a significantly faster 65W charging experience and potentially a lower entry cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious users who value rapid power-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66 - A2643, A2644, A2645 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2643, A2644 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2641 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 24 | 2021, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, September 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.7 mm (6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 240 g (8.47 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1284 x 2778 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | iOS 15, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM, 1TB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6" SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1/3.4", 1.0µm, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.8, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4352 mAh (16.75 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Graphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue, Alpine Green |
| Models | PDRM00, PDRT00 | A2643, A2484, A2641, A2644, A2645, iphone14,3 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 423.38 / $ 394.86 / £ 355.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 801691 (v9) GeekBench: 4706 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
- Significantly faster 65W wired charging
- Potentially lower purchase price
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Likely fewer software updates
- Potentially inferior camera processing
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
- Superior performance with the A15 Bionic
- Long-term software support from Apple
- Excellent camera system with advanced image processing
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo
- Higher purchase price
- Closed ecosystem limitations
Display Comparison
The iPhone 13 Pro Max boasts a display capable of reaching 1050 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno5 Pro+ 5G’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely lower, impacting outdoor readability. The iPhone’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The iPhone 13 Pro Max also benefits from Apple’s ProMotion technology (not mentioned in the provided data, but a key feature), offering adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz for smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent on the Reno5 Pro+ 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having strong photo and video capabilities, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max likely holds an edge due to Apple’s advanced image processing pipeline and sensor technology. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, Apple typically employs larger sensors, capturing more light and detail. The iPhone’s computational photography excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno5 Pro+ 5G’s camera system, while capable, relies on Qualcomm’s ISP and Oppo’s software algorithms, which may not match Apple’s refinement. The absence of detail regarding lens apertures on the Reno5 Pro+ 5G makes a direct comparison difficult, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s wider apertures generally allow for better low-light performance.
Performance
The Apple A15 Bionic, fabricated on a 5nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. The A15’s hexa-core architecture, with its 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche and 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard cores, is optimized for both peak performance and efficiency. The Snapdragon 865’s octa-core configuration, while capable, is older and less efficient. This translates to the iPhone 13 Pro Max handling demanding tasks like video editing and gaming with greater ease and sustained performance, while the Reno5 Pro+ 5G may exhibit more thermal throttling under prolonged load. The iPhone's RAM speed (likely LPDDR5) is also faster than what was typical for the Reno5 Pro+ 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno5 Pro+ 5G). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G’s 65W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 35 minutes, a significant advantage over the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s slower wired charging (50% in 30 minutes via PD2.0). The iPhone 13 Pro Max offers 15W wireless charging with MagSafe and Qi2 (requiring iOS 17.2), while the Reno5 Pro+ 5G also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iPhone.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G if you need blazing-fast 65W charging, prefer the Android operating system, and are comfortable with a phone that will receive fewer software updates. Buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if you prioritize a seamless user experience, industry-leading performance from the A15 Bionic, a consistently excellent camera system, and long-term software support.