Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11i: A Head-to-Head Comparison of 5G Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Xiaomi Mi 11i emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 888’s superior processing power, despite potential thermal throttling, offers a noticeable edge. However, the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G’s faster 65W charging and potentially more refined software experience make it a strong contender for those valuing convenience and a smoother user interface.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11i |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 10 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4350 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Astral Blue, Starry Black, Starry Dream, Star Wish Red | Celestial Silver, Frosty White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | PDSM00, PDST00, CPH2201 | M2012K11G |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 690021 (v8) GeekBench: 3641 (v5.1) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Sleek and stylish design (based on Oppo’s typical aesthetic)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
- Potential for lower peak performance in demanding games
- Limited display brightness information
Xiaomi Mi 11i
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Excellent performance for gaming and demanding apps
- Slower 33W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Software experience may be less polished than Oppo’s
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11i boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 939 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While the Reno5 Pro 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo typically focuses on color accuracy and vibrancy. The Mi 11i’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong AMOLED panel, likely offering deep blacks. The lack of information on the Reno5 Pro 5G’s panel type makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume it also utilizes AMOLED technology given its market positioning. The Mi 11i’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Mi 11i likely features a more advanced camera system given its flagship-adjacent chipset. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more capable than the Dimensity 1000+’s, potentially resulting in better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Mi 11i’s processing power gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11i’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 1000+ (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a substantial performance boost over the Reno5 Pro 5G’s Cortex-A77 cores. However, the 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 offers better thermal efficiency, but is still prone to throttling under sustained load. The Dimensity 1000+ offers a more consistent, albeit lower, level of performance. The Mi 11i will excel in graphically intensive tasks and gaming, while the Reno5 Pro 5G will handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming with ease.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the Xiaomi Mi 11i’s 33W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in a much shorter timeframe (Oppo claims full charge in under 35 minutes). The Mi 11i takes 52 minutes to reach 100%. While the Mi 11i supports PD3.0 and QC3, the Reno5 Pro 5G’s sheer charging speed provides a more convenient experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G if you need exceptionally fast charging, value a sleek design, and prefer a user experience focused on software polish. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11i if you prioritize maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and a more aggressive thermal profile. The Mi 11i is the choice for power users, while the Reno5 Pro 5G caters to those seeking a balanced and convenient experience.