Realme GT 5G vs Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset delivers significantly higher performance, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While both phones share identical charging speeds and battery endurance ratings, the GT 5G’s superior processing power justifies its slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G | Realme GT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 10 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2021, March 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (Glass) / 9.1 mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4350 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Astral Blue, Starry Black, Starry Dream, Star Wish Red | Gold/Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PDSM00, PDST00, CPH2201 | RMX2202 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 703986 (v8), 810433 (v9) GeekBench: 3555 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
- 65W Fast Charging
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 1000+)
- Limited display specifications
- Camera details are sparse
Realme GT 5G
- Significantly more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Higher peak display brightness
- Likely improved image processing
- No reverse wireless charging
- Snapdragon 888 can run hotter under sustained load
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays capable of delivering a vibrant visual experience, but key differences exist. The Realme GT 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 650 nits, suggesting superior outdoor visibility compared to the Reno5 Pro 5G, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the GT 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for users in bright environments. The Reno5 Pro 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and PWM dimming frequency unanswered.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme GT 5G, being a more recent release, likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms. The absence of specific details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it hard to assess low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both phones is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit compared to a well-executed primary sensor.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Realme GT 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a noticeable performance boost over the Reno5 Pro’s Cortex-A77 cores at 2.6 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 1000+ is no slouch, the Snapdragon 888 offers a clear advantage in gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G and Realme GT 5G share an endurance rating of 98 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Snapdragon 888’s higher power consumption. This is likely due to optimizations in software and battery management. Both devices support 65W wired charging, capable of fully charging the battery in approximately 35 minutes. The Reno5 Pro 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the GT 5G, allowing it to top up accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on everyday tasks and media consumption, and appreciate a potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Realme GT 5G if you are a power user, gamer, or frequently engage in resource-intensive applications, and demand the highest possible performance within a reasonable budget.