Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G vs. iPhone 12 Pro Max: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term software support, ecosystem integration, and consistent performance, the iPhone 12 Pro Max remains the superior choice. However, the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G delivers exceptional value with its 65W charging and strong performance, making it ideal for users who prioritize speed and aren't heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - A2342 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave - A2342 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - A2410, A2411, A2412 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 10 | 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 05 | Available. Released 2020, November 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1284 x 2778 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Hexa-core (2x3.1 GHz Firestorm + 4x1.8 GHz Icestorm) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | iOS 14.1, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.9", 1.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 65mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10‑bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.4 update |
| Type | Li-Po 4350 mAh | Li-Ion 3687 mAh (14.13 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Astral Blue, Starry Black, Starry Dream, Star Wish Red | Silver, Graphite, Gold, Pacific Blue |
| Models | PDSM00, PDST00, CPH2201 | A2411, A2342, A2410, A2412, iPhone13,4 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 328.00 / C$ 549.75 / £ 270.67 / € 339.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 599.99 |
| 256GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 728.45 |
| 512GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 886.67 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 627.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 638584 (v8) GeekBench: 4240 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Competitive performance with the Dimensity 1000+
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Shorter software support lifespan compared to iPhone
- Less established ecosystem
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
- Exceptional performance with the A14 Bionic
- Long-term software support and updates
- Superior video recording capabilities
- Seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo
- Higher price point
- Less flexible operating system (iOS)
Display Comparison
The iPhone 12 Pro Max boasts a measured peak brightness of 822 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno5 Pro 5G’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically focuses on color accuracy and vibrancy. The iPhone’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deep blacks and a stunning visual experience. The lack of LTPO technology in either phone means refresh rates are fixed, but the iPhone’s color calibration is generally considered best-in-class.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in camera performance, but approach it differently. The iPhone 12 Pro Max’s camera system is renowned for its computational photography and video recording capabilities. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, Apple’s image processing prioritizes natural-looking images with excellent dynamic range. The Reno5 Pro 5G likely features a more versatile camera setup with a focus on AI-powered scene optimization. However, the iPhone’s video recording, particularly in ProRes format (available on later iPhone models), sets a high bar for quality and flexibility. The Reno5 Pro 5G’s camera is capable, but the iPhone’s consistency and video prowess give it an edge.
Performance
The Apple A14 Bionic, fabricated on a 5nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. The A14’s hexa-core architecture (2x3.1 GHz Firestorm + 4x1.8 GHz Icestorm) is optimized for sustained performance, while the Dimensity 1000+’s octa-core setup (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) prioritizes multi-tasking. The 5nm node of the A14 translates to superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during demanding tasks like gaming. While the Reno5 Pro 5G is no slouch, the iPhone offers a smoother, more responsive experience, particularly in graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno5 Pro 5G). However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s 20W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The iPhone offers 15W wireless charging via MagSafe and Qi2 (with iOS 17.4), while the Reno5 Pro 5G provides 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The Reno5 Pro 5G’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G if you need incredibly fast charging – 65W is a game-changer – and prefer the flexibility of Android. It’s a strong contender for power users who frequently top up their phones. Buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max if you prioritize a seamless user experience, long-term software updates, a robust camera system, and integration with other Apple devices. It’s the safer, more polished option for those invested in the Apple ecosystem.