Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno5 Lite: A Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Reno5 Lite’s Helio P95 and 30W charging, making it a more future-proof and enjoyable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Lite | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 23 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2205 | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 Lite
- Potentially lighter and more ergonomic design (data not provided)
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Slower charging speed
- Less future-proof
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Much faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient chipset for better battery life
- Potentially larger and heavier design (data not provided)
- May be slightly more expensive
- China-specific model may have software limitations
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality is likely similar, but the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro will ensure smoother scrolling and faster response times in graphically intensive applications. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a factor not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Reno5 Lite’s Helio P95 will be capable, but the Dimensity 1100 provides headroom for more complex computational photography features. The absence of sensor details makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s ISP is likely more advanced.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm), featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Oppo Reno5 Lite’s Helio P95 (12nm) with its two Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 is significantly more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The Reno5 Lite will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) truly shines with its 67W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. The Oppo Reno5 Lite’s 30W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 1100’s efficiency may offset a potentially smaller battery in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, providing comparable or even better real-world battery life despite the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Lite if you prioritize a lighter, more streamlined user experience and are comfortable with moderate performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you demand faster processing speeds for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly rapid charging that minimizes downtime. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.