Poco X3 Pro vs Oppo Reno5 Lite: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 provides a substantial performance advantage, particularly for gaming, and its 33W charging is faster. While the Reno5 Lite offers a more stylish design, it can't match the Poco's raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Lite | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 23 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CPH2205 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Lite
- Superior gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 860.
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals.
- Potentially less refined design compared to the Reno5 Lite.
- Software experience may not be as polished as Oppo's ColorOS.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Sleek and stylish design.
- Fast 30W charging.
- Potentially more optimized software experience.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
- Helio P95 chipset may struggle with demanding games.
Display Comparison
Both the Poco X3 Pro and Reno5 Lite share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar black levels and color vibrancy. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Reno5 Lite. The Poco X3 Pro's 120Hz refresh rate, while not explicitly stated for the Reno5 Lite, is a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming. Without knowing the Reno5 Lite's panel technology, it's difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Poco's higher refresh rate provides a tangible benefit for visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. The absence of specifics makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco X3 Pro likely prioritizes overall image quality, while the Reno5 Lite may focus on selfie enhancements. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it's impossible to determine low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco X3 Pro's Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a flagship-level chipset from the previous generation, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo Reno5 Lite's MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860's more advanced 7nm process and superior core architecture deliver significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The P95's Cortex-A75 cores are older and less efficient, resulting in lower sustained performance and potentially more thermal throttling under load. Gamers will overwhelmingly benefit from the Poco X3 Pro's processing power.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X3 Pro's 33W wired charging is considerably faster than the Reno5 Lite's 30W charging. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, offering a significant convenience advantage. While both offer all-day battery life, the Poco's faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about running low on power.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 Lite if you prioritize a sleek design, a lighter weight, and a more polished software experience, and your primary use case doesn't involve demanding mobile games. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you're a mobile gamer, value performance above all else, and want the fastest charging speeds in this price bracket. The Poco is also ideal for users who frequently multitask or run resource-intensive applications.