Oppo Reno5 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the stronger choice, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and generally better camera performance. While the Reno5 Lite offers a slightly faster charging speed, the A34's overall package provides better value and future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 23 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | CPH2205 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Lite
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Potentially Lower Price
- Sleek Design (typical of Oppo)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Likely Inferior Camera
- Older Software Support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Superior Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Brighter Display (1009 nits)
- Better Camera System
- Longer Software Support
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead with its 1009 nits max brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno5 Lite's display is likely adequate but lacks the A34's punch and outdoor usability. Resolution and panel type (likely AMOLED for the A34) further contribute to the A34's advantage.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded, and the A34 likely benefits from a more modern sensor. The Reno5 Lite's camera is likely decent, but won't match the A34's versatility and image quality.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm) chipset is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Reno5 Lite's Helio P95 (12nm). The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores offer a noticeable performance boost in demanding tasks and gaming. The Reno5 Lite's performance will be adequate for everyday use, but it will struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 133h, indicating excellent battery life. However, the A34's more efficient chipset likely contributes to slightly better real-world performance. While the Reno5 Lite has 30W charging, the A34's 25W is still respectable and the battery life compensates for the slightly slower charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 Lite is a good option for users prioritizing fast charging and a potentially more budget-friendly price point. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, reliable performance, a versatile camera system, and longer software support.