Oppo Reno5 Lite vs Oppo Reno5 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner, offering 5G connectivity, a significantly faster Snapdragon 765G chipset, faster charging, and a brighter display. While the Reno5 Lite is more affordable, the Reno5 5G provides a superior overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 Lite | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 23 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2205 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 Lite
- More affordable
- Large display
- Decent battery life
- Slower processor
- No 5G
- Slower charging
- Less bright display
Oppo Reno5 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- Faster charging (65W)
- Brighter display
- Better camera performance
- More expensive
- Potentially slightly larger/heavier
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G boasts a significantly brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 634 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. Its 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The Reno5 Lite's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Expect more vibrant colors and sharper details on the Reno5 5G.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Reno5 5G likely has an edge due to the Snapdragon 765G's image signal processor (ISP). Expect better image processing, low-light performance, and video recording capabilities on the Reno5 5G. Both phones likely feature similar camera hardware, but the Reno5 5G's software and processing will be superior.
Performance
The Reno5 5G's Snapdragon 765G chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Reno5 Lite's Helio P95. The Snapdragon offers significantly faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 7nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency. The Reno5 Lite will handle everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes, compared to the Reno5 Lite's 30W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and don't need 5G. The Oppo Reno5 5G is perfect for those seeking faster performance, 5G connectivity, quicker charging, and a better camera experience, even if it means spending a bit more.