Oppo Reno5 K vs Reno6 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno6 5G edges out the Reno5 K thanks to its slightly more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset and brighter display. While the Reno5 K offers excellent value with its Snapdragon 750G, the Reno6 5G provides a more premium experience overall.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 K | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 05 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Starry Dream, Blue Breeze | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | PEGM10 | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
Oppo Reno5 K
- Fast 65W Charging
- Reliable Snapdragon 750G
- Good Value for Money
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Less Bright Display
- Camera may not be as refined
Oppo Reno6 5G
- More Powerful Dimensity 900 Chipset
- Brighter Display
- Potentially Better Camera Performance
- Excellent Battery Life (109h Endurance)
- Higher Price
- May not offer significant improvements for casual users
Display Comparison
The Reno6 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 632 nits, offering better visibility in bright sunlight compared to the Reno5 K. While the Reno6 5G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), both phones likely offer vibrant colors and sharp visuals. The Reno6 5G's brighter screen gives it a slight advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno6 5G likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance. Specific camera specs are not fully detailed, but the Dimensity 900 often pairs with improved image signal processors. Expect both to capture good quality photos and videos.
Performance
The Reno6 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset (6nm) generally outperforms the Reno5 K's Snapdragon 750G (8nm) in benchmarks and real-world usage. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the Reno6 5G. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease, but the Reno6 5G provides a more responsive feel.
Battery Life
Both phones share a 65W wired charging capability, promising rapid charging times. The Reno6 5G boasts an endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Reno5 K's battery capacity isn't explicitly stated, it's likely comparable, ensuring all-day usage for most users.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 K is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and a reliable processor for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno6 5G is a better choice for those seeking a smoother performance, a brighter display, and a slightly more refined camera experience, even if it comes at a higher price.