The Oppo Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. Choosing between the Reno5 K and Reno5 Z can be tricky, as both offer compelling value. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 K takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging (65W vs 30W) and a generally more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 750G). However, the Reno5 Z might appeal to those prioritizing a slightly more compact design and potentially a more refined camera experience, depending on specific usage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 05 | Available. Released 2021, April 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired
5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Starry Dream, Blue Breeze | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue |
| Models | PEGM10 | CPH2211 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 K
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Future-proof 5G connectivity
- Good overall performance
- Potentially slightly less refined camera processing
- Design might be less premium than Reno5 Z
Oppo Reno5 Z
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slightly more compact design
- Good selfie camera
- Slower 30W charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- May struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno5 Z might have a slightly more refined color calibration out of the box, but the Reno5 K's display is perfectly adequate. Screen sizes are similar, around 6.4-6.5 inches, making them both comfortable to hold and use.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer versatile camera setups, the Reno5 Z is often praised for its slightly better image processing and color accuracy in certain lighting conditions. The Reno5 K's camera is still very good, but it might require a bit more tweaking to achieve optimal results. Both offer good selfie cameras.
Performance
The Snapdragon 750G in the Reno5 K provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Dimensity 800U in the Reno5 Z. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 K. The Reno5 Z is still capable, but it may struggle with more demanding games at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Reno5 K's 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. It can fully charge the phone in around 35-40 minutes, while the Reno5 Z's 30W charging takes considerably longer. Battery capacities are similar, around 4000-4500 mAh, so the Reno5 K's charging speed makes a significant difference in overall battery experience.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 K is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, and a future-proof 5G connection. The Oppo Reno5 Z is a good choice for those seeking a slightly more compact phone with a focus on photography and a more streamlined user experience, and who don't mind slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 K worth the extra cost?
If fast charging and performance are priorities, then yes. The Reno5 K's Snapdragon 750G and 65W charging offer a significant advantage.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both have similar battery capacities, but the Reno5 K's faster charging makes it feel like it has better overall battery life due to the reduced charging time.
❓ Can the Reno5 K handle demanding games?
Yes, the Reno5 K's Snapdragon 750G can handle most demanding games at medium to high settings. The Reno5 Z might struggle more.
