Oppo Reno5 K vs Oppo Reno5 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G edges out the Reno5 K thanks to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset and brighter display. However, the Reno5 K offers incredibly fast 65W charging and might be a better value for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 K | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 05 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Starry Dream, Blue Breeze | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | PEGM10 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 K
- Incredibly fast 65W charging
- More affordable price
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Stylish design
- Slightly less powerful chipset than Reno5 5G
- Potentially less bright display
- Camera details are limited
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Slightly faster Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better camera performance
- Premium feel
- Higher price point
- 65W charging, but no reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 634 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight compared to the Reno5 K. While the Reno5 5G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term), both phones feature AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno5 K's display is still excellent, but the Reno5 5G has a slight edge in brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but specifics are missing. Generally, the Reno5 5G's slightly more advanced chipset and potentially better image processing algorithms could result in marginally better photo and video quality. Both likely offer similar features like portrait mode and night mode.
Performance
The Snapdragon 765G in the Reno5 5G provides a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 750G in the Reno5 K. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and gaming, the Reno5 5G will feel snappier and handle more demanding applications with greater ease. The 7nm process of the 765G also contributes to slightly better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones share the same 65W fast charging capability, allowing for incredibly quick top-ups. The listed endurance rating of 109h for both is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life under moderate usage. Real-world battery performance will depend on usage patterns, but both should easily last a full day.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno5 K? Users prioritizing fast charging and a more affordable price point. Who should buy the Oppo Reno5 5G? Those seeking a slightly faster processor, a brighter display, and a more premium feel.