Oppo Reno5 K vs Reno 10x Zoom: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno 10x Zoom wins overall thanks to its Snapdragon 855 chipset, superior camera capabilities, and significantly faster charging. However, the Reno5 K offers a more modern design and potentially better value for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 K | Oppo Reno 10x zoom |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 05 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Starry Dream, Blue Breeze | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | PEGM10 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8) GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 K
- Faster Charging (65W)
- Modern Design
- Potentially Better Value
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Likely Inferior Camera
- Lower Display Brightness
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Flagship Chipset (Snapdragon 855)
- Superior Camera Performance
- Excellent Battery Life
- Theoretically Infinite Contrast Ratio Display
- Slower Charging (20W)
- Older Design
- Potentially Higher Price (due to age)
Display Comparison
The Reno 10x Zoom boasts a theoretically infinite contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. While the Reno5 K's display is likely good, the 440 nits brightness of the Reno 10x Zoom is a key factor. Expect better outdoor visibility on the older model.
Camera Comparison
The Reno 10x Zoom's camera system is likely more advanced, given its age and the Snapdragon 855's image processing capabilities. While both offer 'Photo/Video' functionality, the 10x Zoom likely has better zoom capabilities and overall image quality, especially in low light. The Reno5 K will still take good photos, but won't match the flagship performance.
Performance
The Snapdragon 855 in the Reno 10x Zoom is a significant step up from the Snapdragon 750G in the Reno5 K. While the 750G is capable, the 855 offers noticeably faster processing speeds and better handling of demanding games and applications. The Reno 10x Zoom will feel snappier overall.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 107 hours. This suggests excellent battery life for both devices, though real-world usage will vary. However, the Reno5 K's 65W charging is a massive advantage, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Reno 10x Zoom's 20W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 K is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, a modern design, and a smoother everyday experience on a tighter budget. The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom is best suited for photography enthusiasts and those who demand flagship-level performance, even in an older device.