The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Oppo Reno5 F represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a flagship-level processor at a budget price, while the Reno5 F prioritizes a sleek design and balanced feature set. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage, particularly for gaming, and its 33W charging is faster. However, users prioritizing a more refined aesthetic and potentially longer standby times may prefer the Oppo Reno5 F.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CPH2217 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Superior gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 860.
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals.
- Less refined design compared to the Reno5 F.
- Potentially less optimized camera software.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Sleek and stylish design.
- Efficient 30W charging.
- Potentially better camera software optimization.
- Significantly weaker performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
- Helio P95 chipset may struggle with future software updates.
Display Comparison
Both the Poco X3 Pro and Reno5 F share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar black levels and color vibrancy. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the Reno5 F. The Poco X3 Pro’s 120Hz refresh rate, while not explicitly stated for the Reno5 F, is a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming. The Reno5 F’s design likely prioritizes aesthetics, while the Poco X3 Pro’s display is geared towards responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco X3 Pro may prioritize image processing speed for gaming-related content capture, while the Reno5 F might focus on more aesthetically pleasing, social media-ready images. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the Reno5 F’s brand reputation suggests a stronger emphasis on camera software features.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Oppo Reno5 F’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 Gold cores, clocked up to 2.96 GHz, deliver a noticeable boost in CPU performance, while its Adreno 640 GPU provides a far superior gaming experience. The Helio P95, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with demanding titles. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging significantly outperforms the Reno5 F’s 30W charging. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, offering a much faster top-up time. While the Reno5 F’s charging is still respectable, the Poco X3 Pro’s speed is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 F if you need a stylish phone with a focus on everyday tasks, social media, and moderate multimedia consumption. Its 30W charging is efficient, and the design is more premium. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, demand fast charging, and are willing to accept a more utilitarian design in exchange for raw power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its efficient thermal management. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the 7nm process node and Xiaomi’s cooling solutions should prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance.
❓ Is the Reno5 F’s 30W charging slow compared to the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W?
While not drastically slower, the Reno5 F’s 30W charging takes longer to reach a full charge. The Poco X3 Pro can gain a significant amount of battery life in a short period, making it more convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Can the Oppo Reno5 F handle graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Reno5 F’s Helio P95 chipset will likely struggle with these titles at higher settings. You may need to reduce graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, performance may be inconsistent.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro have a good display for media consumption?
Yes, the Poco X3 Pro’s 120Hz display provides a smooth and immersive experience for watching videos and browsing content. While peak brightness details are missing, the panel is generally considered to be of good quality for its price range.
