The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno5 F and Realme C55 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme C55 edges out the Oppo Reno5 F thanks to its faster charging, brighter display, and slightly more modern chipset. While the Reno5 F has a marginally more powerful CPU, the C55's overall package provides better value and a smoother user experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | CPH2217 | RMX3710 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Slightly more powerful CPU
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower charging
- Less bright display
- Older chipset
Realme C55
- Faster charging (33W)
- Brighter display (659 nits)
- More power-efficient (123h endurance)
- More modern chipset
- Slightly slower CPU clock speed
Display Comparison
The Realme C55 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 659 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. Both phones share a 1264:1 contrast ratio, indicating good color reproduction, but the C55's brightness gives it a noticeable edge in real-world usage. The Reno5 F's display is adequate but lacks the punch of the C55's.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively declare a winner without extensive testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems for their price range. The Reno5 F likely has a slightly better image processing pipeline, potentially resulting in more vibrant colors. The Realme C55's camera is generally well-regarded for its consistent performance and pleasing results. Both likely offer similar video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo Reno5 F's Helio P95 chipset has a slightly faster CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz on the C55's Helio G88). However, the G88's architecture and optimizations often result in comparable or even better real-world performance, especially in everyday tasks. Gaming performance is likely similar on both devices, though the Reno5 F might have a slight edge in graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The Realme C55 shines in this category. Both phones have similar battery capacities, but the C55's endurance rating of 123h suggests superior power efficiency. Furthermore, the C55's 33W charging is faster than the Reno5 F's 30W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 F is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful processor for demanding games or apps. The Realme C55 is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, fast charging, and a well-rounded experience without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno5 F has a slightly faster CPU, which *could* translate to marginally better performance in demanding games. However, both phones are primarily designed for casual gaming and may struggle with the highest graphics settings.
❓ Is the Realme C55's display good for outdoor use?
Yes, the Realme C55's 659 nits max brightness makes it significantly more usable outdoors compared to the Oppo Reno5 F. You'll be able to see the screen clearly even in bright sunlight.
