The Oppo Reno5 F and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Reno5 F leans on a sleek design and MediaTek’s Helio P95, while the Realme 8 Pro prioritizes camera capabilities and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, offers superior efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Reno5 F’s 12nm Helio P95. The significantly faster 50W charging also provides a tangible benefit in daily use, offsetting the identical battery endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | CPH2217 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Potentially lighter design due to chipset differences.
- May offer a slightly more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS version).
- Slightly higher clocked prime CPU core.
- Less efficient Helio P95 chipset leads to potential throttling.
- Slower 30W charging compared to the Realme 8 Pro.
- Likely inferior image processing capabilities.
Realme 8 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset for sustained performance.
- Significantly faster 50W charging.
- Superior image processing thanks to Qualcomm’s ISP.
- Potentially slightly heavier due to chipset and battery optimization.
- Prime CPU core clocked slightly lower than the Reno5 F.
- Software experience can be more heavily customized.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The Realme 8 Pro’s display benefits from the Snapdragon 720G’s ISP for potential image enhancement, but without concrete data, this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but the Realme 8 Pro likely holds an advantage due to Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP). While sensor details are absent, the Snapdragon 720G’s ISP is known for its strong image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno5 F relies on MediaTek’s ISP, which, while capable, generally doesn’t match the Qualcomm equivalent in dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of details on lens apertures and sensor sizes makes a definitive judgment difficult, but the Realme 8 Pro’s chipset provides a foundational advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) boasts a more efficient architecture than the Oppo Reno5 F’s Helio P95 (12nm). While the Reno5 F’s CPU clocks slightly higher on its prime core (2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz), the Snapdragon 720G’s Kryo 465 Gold cores and smaller fabrication node translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. This means the Realme 8 Pro is less likely to throttle under prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. The 8nm process inherently generates less heat.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 17 minutes and a full charge in 47 minutes, significantly faster than the Reno5 F’s 30W charging. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, offering a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 F if you prioritize a lighter, potentially more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS version) and are less demanding in terms of gaming or sustained heavy workloads. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value camera versatility, longer-term performance stability, and significantly faster charging speeds – making it ideal for power users and mobile photographers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings. Its Adreno 618 GPU provides sufficient graphical power, and the 8nm process ensures better thermal management, preventing significant frame drops during extended gaming sessions. While not a flagship-level experience, it’s a very capable performer.
❓ Does the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro generate a lot of heat during charging?
While 50W charging is fast, Realme has implemented thermal management systems to mitigate heat generation. The phone will warm up during charging, but it shouldn't become uncomfortably hot. The charging speed is optimized to balance speed and safety, preventing damage to the battery.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio P95 and Snapdragon 720G noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, when multitasking, running demanding apps, or editing photos/videos, the Snapdragon 720G’s superior processing power and efficiency will result in a smoother and more responsive experience.
