Choosing between the Oppo Reno5 F and Reno5 5G can be tricky. Both offer stylish designs and impressive features, but cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses, helping you make the right decision for your budget and usage.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 5G is the clear winner, offering significantly faster performance thanks to the Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset and blazing-fast 65W charging. While the Reno5 F is more affordable, the 5G model's superior speed, connectivity, and charging justify the price difference for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2217 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 109h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 317762(v8)
GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 F
- More affordable
- Large display
- Decent camera
- Slower performance
- No 5G
- Slower charging
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Faster performance (Snapdragon 765G 5G)
- 5G connectivity
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display
- More expensive
- Potentially slightly larger/heavier
Display Comparison
The Reno5 5G boasts a brighter display (634 nits vs unspecified for F) and an impressive contrast ratio (Infinite nominal). While both likely feature AMOLED panels, the 5G model offers a noticeably more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Reno5 F's display is still good, but lacks the punch of the 5G version.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno5 5G likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to the more powerful chipset. Both likely offer similar lens configurations (main, ultrawide, macro, potentially a depth sensor), but the 5G model's processing advantage translates to better overall image quality. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
Here's where the Reno5 5G truly shines. The Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Helio P95 in the Reno5 F. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 5G model. The Reno5 F is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 109h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno5 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 35 minutes, compared to the Reno5 F's 30W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 F is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and decent camera capabilities without needing 5G connectivity. The Oppo Reno5 5G is perfect for those who demand fast performance, 5G speeds, and rapid charging, and are willing to pay a premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 F worth buying in 2024?
If you're on a tight budget and don't need 5G, the Reno5 F can still be a decent option for basic usage. However, consider newer, more powerful budget phones.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno5 5G support global 5G bands?
It's crucial to check the specific model number and carrier compatibility to ensure it supports 5G bands in your region. Oppo often releases region-specific variants.
