The Oppo Reno series consistently delivers stylish designs and competitive features. But when choosing between the Reno5 F and Reno5 4G, which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall user experience to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 4G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset, and generally smoother performance. While the Reno5 F is a decent option, the Reno5 4G's superior hardware makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2020, December 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Galactic Silver (Fantasy Silver), Starlight Black (Starry Black) |
| Models | CPH2217 | CPH2159 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Large Display
- Stylish Design
- Decent Camera
- Slower Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Efficient Chipset
Oppo Reno5 4G
- Faster Performance
- Fast Charging (50W)
- More Efficient Chipset
- Better Image Processing
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. However, the Reno5 4G's slightly better color accuracy and brightness might give it a marginal edge in certain lighting conditions. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones boast a quad-camera setup, typically including a 48MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, a macro lens, and a depth sensor. While image quality is generally good on both, the Reno5 4G's superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance give it an advantage. Expect similar selfie camera capabilities (around 32MP).
Performance
The Snapdragon 720G in the Reno5 4G is noticeably more powerful and efficient than the Helio P95 in the Reno5 F. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno5 4G. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Reno5 4G's 50W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 48 minutes. The Reno5 F's 30W charging is slower, taking considerably longer to reach full capacity. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4000mAh) on both devices, but the Reno5 4G's efficiency gives it an edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 F is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and don't demand top-tier performance. The Oppo Reno5 4G is ideal for those seeking a balance of performance, fast charging, and a premium experience, willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno5 F worth buying in 2024?
It depends on your budget and needs. If you're on a tight budget and prioritize a large display, it's a decent option. However, the Reno5 4G offers significantly better value overall.
❓ Which chipset is better: Helio P95 or Snapdragon 720G?
The Snapdragon 720G is significantly better. It offers superior performance, efficiency, and supports more advanced features.
