Oppo consistently delivers stylish and feature-rich smartphones. The Reno5 F and A96 are two popular options, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences, helping you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A96 edges out the Reno5 F thanks to its more efficient 6nm Snapdragon 680 chipset, faster charging, and generally improved performance. While the Reno5 F has a slightly better display, the A96 offers a more compelling overall package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2022, March 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Starry Black, Sunset Blue |
| Models | CPH2217 | CPH2333 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 560 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Slightly more premium design
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Decent selfie camera
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Shorter battery life
- Can feel sluggish
Oppo A96
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Faster 33W charging with PD
- Longer battery life
- Better overall performance
- Reverse wired charging
- Less premium design
- Camera performance slightly less impressive in low light
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch FHD+ AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the Reno5 F might have slightly better color accuracy and brightness, though the difference is minimal. The A96's display is still excellent.
Camera Comparison
The Reno5 F boasts a 48MP main camera, 8MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro, while the A96 features a 50MP main camera, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the A96 generally captures more detailed and vibrant photos, particularly in well-lit conditions. Both offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
The Oppo A96's Snapdragon 680 (6nm) significantly outperforms the Reno5 F's Helio P95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680 offers better efficiency and smoother multitasking, especially noticeable in demanding apps and games. The Reno5 F can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
The Oppo A96 has a 5000mAh battery compared to the Reno5 F's 4300mAh. Coupled with the more efficient Snapdragon 680, the A96 offers significantly better battery life. The A96's 33W charging is also faster than the Reno5 F's 30W.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno5 F is a good choice for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a slightly more premium design. The Oppo A96 is ideal for those seeking better performance, faster charging, and improved power efficiency without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo A96 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 680 chipset and improved thermal management.
❓ Does the Oppo A96 support 5G?
No, neither the Oppo Reno5 F nor the Oppo A96 support 5G connectivity. They are both 4G devices.
❓ What is PD charging?
PD (Power Delivery) is a charging standard that allows for faster charging speeds and more efficient power transfer. The Oppo A96 supports PD charging.
