The Motorola Moto G100S and Oppo Reno5 F represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Reno5 F, released earlier, aims for a balance of style and functionality, while the G100S arrives with a newer, more efficient chipset, promising improved performance and longevity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the most compelling user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance and efficiency, the Motorola Moto G100S is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant advantage over the Reno5 F’s 12nm Helio P95, translating to better multitasking and sustained performance under load.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Black, Blue |
| Models | CPH2217 | - |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 F
- Potentially more vibrant color profile (based on Oppo’s brand identity)
- Established software ecosystem and user base
- Proven reliability in the mid-range segment
- Less efficient 12nm Helio P95 chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance under load
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Superior CPU performance with Cortex-A78 cores
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Potential for longer battery life
- Motorola’s software update track record is less consistent than Oppo’s
- May have a less saturated image profile (depending on tuning)
- Newer device, potentially fewer user reviews available
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Without specific display specs, we can assume both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The key difference will likely be color calibration and peak brightness. The Reno5 F, given Oppo’s history, may offer slightly more vibrant colors, while the G100S’s display quality will depend on Motorola’s implementation. Bezels are likely comparable, and neither is expected to feature high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera setups. The G100S’s image processing will likely benefit from the more powerful chipset, enabling faster processing of HDR and night mode shots. The Reno5 F may lean towards a more saturated, ‘social media-ready’ image profile, typical of Oppo’s tuning. We can assume both will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but sensor size and aperture will be critical differentiators.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G100S’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the Oppo Reno5 F’s Helio P95 (12nm). The 4nm fabrication process inherently delivers superior power efficiency and thermal management. The G100S’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – also provides a performance edge over the Reno5 F’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Cortex-A78 cores in the G100S are architecturally more advanced, offering better IPC (Instructions Per Clock). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Reno5 F will be adequate for everyday tasks, but will likely struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, suggesting comparable charging speeds – likely around 60-70 minutes for a full charge. The actual battery life will depend on the battery capacity (not provided) and the chipset’s efficiency. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process gives the G100S a significant advantage in power efficiency, meaning it will likely deliver longer battery life on a single charge, even with a similar capacity battery to the Reno5 F.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 F if you prioritize a proven track record and are looking for a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you value future-proofing, smoother performance in demanding apps, and a more efficient chipset that will likely hold up better over time, especially if you're a moderate mobile gamer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G100S handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s CPU and GPU architecture, combined with the 4nm process, should provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience in PUBG Mobile compared to the Reno5 F. While it won’t match flagship-level performance, it should be capable of running the game at medium to high settings with stable frame rates.
❓ How does the efficiency of the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 translate to real-world battery savings compared to the Reno5 F?
The 4nm process used in the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 is significantly more power-efficient than the 12nm process of the Helio P95. This means the G100S will consume less power for the same tasks, resulting in potentially several hours of extra battery life, especially during prolonged use like video streaming or gaming.
❓ Is Motorola’s software update support as reliable as Oppo’s?
Historically, Motorola’s software update track record has been less consistent than Oppo’s. Oppo generally provides faster and more frequent updates, including security patches. While Motorola has improved in recent years, users prioritizing timely updates may find Oppo a more appealing option.
