The Oppo Reno5 F and Honor 500 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Reno5 F, released earlier, aims for affordability, while the Honor 500 brings a newer generation chipset and faster charging to the table. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 500 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset provides a substantial performance leap over the Reno5 F’s Helio P95, and the 80W charging is a game-changer. While the Reno5 F remains a viable budget option, the Honor 500 offers a significantly improved experience for a relatively small price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 17 | 2025, November 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2025, November 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 155.8 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.13 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1264 x 2736 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 6000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 825 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 16, MagicOS 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5, Auracast, ASHA |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass (ultrasound) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 80W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Black, Silver, Blue, Pink |
| Models | CPH2217 | MEY-AN00 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 F
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Established brand reputation
- Outdated Helio P95 chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Limited gaming performance
Honor 500
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Improved camera capabilities
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno5 F's market positioning, it likely features a 60Hz AMOLED panel. The Honor 500, being a newer device, may incorporate a higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz) AMOLED panel for smoother scrolling and animations. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s ISP supports higher resolution displays, suggesting the Honor 500 could offer a sharper image. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Honor 500 may benefit from more advanced display calibration techniques.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s image signal processor (ISP) is far more advanced than the one found in the Helio P95. This translates to better image processing, improved dynamic range, and superior low-light performance on the Honor 500. The Honor 500 is likely to support more advanced camera features like 8K video recording and improved computational photography algorithms. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Honor 500’s ISP will extract more detail and clarity from its sensors.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Honor 500’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) is a modern, high-performance chipset featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.21 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo Reno5 F’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A75 cores. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 delivers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance will be higher and throttling less frequent. The Honor 500 will excel in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, while the Reno5 F will struggle with these workloads. The Honor 500's newer CPU architecture will also provide a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Honor 500’s 80W wired charging is a major advantage. This allows for a full charge in approximately 30-40 minutes, significantly faster than the Reno5 F’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s superior power efficiency means the Honor 500 will likely offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The Honor 500 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Reno5 F, allowing it to top up accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 F if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Honor 500 if you demand smoother multitasking, enjoy mobile gaming, or value significantly faster charging speeds and a more future-proofed processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor 500’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is built on a 4nm process, which significantly improves thermal efficiency compared to the Reno5 F’s Helio P95. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Honor 500 is designed to manage temperatures effectively and minimize throttling, providing a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo Reno5 F slow compared to the Honor 500’s 80W charging?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 30W charging will take considerably longer to fully charge the Reno5 F – likely over an hour and a half. The Honor 500’s 80W charging can replenish the battery from 0 to 100% in around 30-40 minutes, making it much more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Can the Honor 500 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is more than capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact and Call of Duty Mobile. You can expect smooth frame rates at high settings, although sustained performance may vary depending on the phone’s cooling system and ambient temperature. The Reno5 F would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in these titles.
❓ Does the Honor 500 support 5G connectivity?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 includes an integrated 5G modem, meaning the Honor 500 supports 5G connectivity. The Reno5 F's 4G modem will not be able to connect to 5G networks.
