The Oppo Reno5 4G and Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Reno5 4G prioritizes a more powerful processor and significantly faster charging, while the Moto G Stylus focuses on affordability and the convenience of a built-in stylus. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and quick top-ups, the Oppo Reno5 4G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset and 50W charging offer a noticeably smoother experience and reduced downtime. However, the Moto G Stylus remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users who value stylus functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | CDMA 800 / 1900 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 31 | 2021, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 09 | Available. Released 2021, January 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 169.8 x 77.9 x 9 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| | - | Stylus
Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SDM678 Snapdragon 678 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min
Reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver (Fantasy Silver), Starlight Black (Starry Black) | Aurora Black, Aurora White |
| Models | CPH2159 | XT2115, XT2115-1 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 90 EUR |
Oppo Reno5 4G
- Faster Snapdragon 720G processor for smoother performance
- Significantly faster 50W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- May be more expensive than the Moto G Stylus
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and sketching
- Likely larger battery capacity for extended use
- More affordable price point
- Slower Snapdragon 678 processor
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- Potentially less refined camera experience
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The Reno5 4G’s potential for a higher refresh rate (common in Reno series phones) would provide a smoother visual experience, though unconfirmed. The Moto G Stylus’s larger screen size (typically a feature of the G Stylus line) is beneficial for media consumption, but the lack of details prevents a definitive brightness or color accuracy comparison.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Reno series historically emphasizes camera capabilities. It’s reasonable to assume the Reno5 4G features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor size than the Moto G Stylus. The Moto G Stylus likely prioritizes affordability, potentially resulting in a less refined camera experience, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a stylus on the Moto G Stylus could be used for creative camera features, but this is speculative without further information.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno5 4G’s Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)’s Snapdragon 678 (11nm). The 8nm node is more efficient, translating to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Reno5’s CPU, with its 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold cores, will handle demanding tasks and gaming more effectively than the Moto G Stylus’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold cores. The larger process node of the SDM678 suggests it will throttle more quickly during extended use.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) likely has a larger battery capacity, typical of the G Stylus line, prioritizing all-day battery life. However, the Oppo Reno5 4G’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 100% charge in just 48 minutes, mitigating the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Moto G Stylus’s 10W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to fully recharge, making it less convenient for users who need quick power boosts.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 4G if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, moderate gaming, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently multitask or consume media. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) if you prefer a larger screen, integrated stylus for note-taking and sketching, and prioritize affordability over raw processing power. It’s a solid choice for students or those needing a basic, reliable smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 678 in the Moto G Stylus struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 678 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it will likely struggle with demanding titles like PUBG or Call of Duty at higher settings. Expect reduced frame rates and potential stuttering, requiring you to lower graphics settings for a playable experience. The Reno5 4G’s Snapdragon 720G offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Oppo Reno5 4G compared to the 10W charging on the Moto G Stylus in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo Reno5 4G can go from 0-100% in approximately 48 minutes. The Moto G Stylus, with its 10W charging, will likely take over 3 hours to achieve a full charge. This means you can quickly top up the Reno5 during short breaks, while the Moto G Stylus requires overnight charging.
❓ Is the stylus on the Moto G Stylus useful for more than just taking notes?
Yes, the stylus offers versatility. Beyond note-taking, it can be used for sketching, navigating the interface with precision, and even signing documents. While not a replacement for a dedicated graphics tablet, it adds a unique level of functionality not found on the Reno5 4G.
