Oppo Reno5 4G vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software support, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the better choice. However, if rapid charging and a slightly more powerful CPU for everyday tasks are paramount, the Oppo Reno5 4G offers a compelling alternative, especially at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno5 4G | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 31 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 09 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver (Fantasy Silver), Starlight Black (Starry Black) | Mostly Black |
| Models | CPH2159 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno5 4G
- Significantly faster 50W charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slightly more powerful CPU for everyday tasks
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Display likely less bright than Pixel 5a
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Superior camera image processing
- Guaranteed software updates from Google
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 18W charging
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 861 nits, compared to the Reno5 4G (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this segment). This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Pixel 5a’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The Reno5 4G’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a standard OLED panel, while the Pixel 5a’s brightness indicates a higher-quality panel optimized for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 5a 5G’s camera prowess is largely attributed to Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver excellent dynamic range and detail. The Reno5 4G likely relies more on hardware specifications, but without detailed information, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 5a’s focus on software optimization gives it a significant advantage, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno5 4G may offer more versatile shooting modes, but the Pixel 5a’s consistent image quality is a stronger selling point.
Performance
Both phones utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon 7-series chipsets, but the Pixel 5a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) has a slight edge over the Reno5 4G’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 765G features a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance boost over the Reno5’s 2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold cores. The 7nm process node of the 765G also contributes to better power efficiency. While both have 6x 1.8 GHz efficiency cores, the Pixel 5a’s integrated 5G modem adds future-proofing, though it may impact battery life. The Reno5 4G’s CPU is still capable for everyday tasks, but the Pixel 5a will handle more demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno5 4G and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, their charging approaches differ drastically. The Reno5 4G’s 50W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 48 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 5a’s 18W charging with PD2.0. The Pixel 5a prioritizes efficiency, while the Reno5 4G prioritizes speed. The Reno5 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 5a, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno5 4G if you need blazing-fast 50W charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. It’s ideal for users who value a sleek aesthetic and don’t heavily rely on 5G connectivity. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prioritize exceptional camera performance, guaranteed software updates directly from Google, and future-proof 5G capabilities. It’s the better option for photography enthusiasts and those seeking a long-term, reliable software experience.