The Oppo Reno4 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection, display technology, and camera implementation. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and value, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G emerges as the slightly stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a modest performance advantage, while the Reno4’s faster 30W charging is offset by a similar endurance rating. However, the Reno4’s price point may make it a more attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 29. Released 2020, August 05 | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Galactic Blue, Space Black | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | CPH2113 | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318117 (v8)
GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4
- Faster 30W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Sleek and lightweight design (based on brand reputation)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Limited display brightness information
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Brighter 610 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Wider range of storage options (64GB/128GB)
- Slower 20W charging
- Higher price compared to some Reno4 configurations
- Potential for more software bloat (based on brand reputation)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 610 nits, which translates to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Reno4 (brightness data unavailable). While both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the Mi 10 Lite’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The Reno4’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume both utilize AMOLED technology for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are advertised as having photo and video capabilities. The Mi 10 Lite 5G’s camera system likely benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 765G, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. Without specific details on sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Mi 10 Lite 5G’s chipset advantage suggests a slight edge in overall image quality. It's important to note that the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno4 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm), while the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G features the Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a performance boost over the Reno4’s 2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold cores. The 7nm process node of the 765G also contributes to improved power efficiency. While both phones have 6GB of RAM in some configurations, the 765G’s superior CPU and GPU will result in smoother multitasking and better gaming performance, particularly in graphically intensive titles. The Reno4’s 720G is still capable, but the Mi 10 Lite 5G has a clear edge.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno4 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, they differ significantly in charging speeds. The Reno4 supports 30W wired charging, claiming a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, while the Mi 10 Lite 5G is limited to 20W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support. This means the Reno4 will replenish its battery much faster, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need a quick top-up. Despite the slower charging, the Mi 10 Lite 5G’s comparable endurance rating suggests efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are looking for a phone that can quickly top up its battery during short breaks. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you value a slightly more powerful processor for demanding applications and gaming, and appreciate a brighter display for outdoor visibility. Consider the Mi 10 Lite 5G if you need more storage options at the time of purchase.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the Mi 10 Lite 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Reno4's 720G?
While both chipsets are efficient, the Snapdragon 765G's higher performance ceiling means it's more likely to generate heat under sustained load. However, the 7nm process node helps mitigate this, and Xiaomi typically employs thermal management solutions. The Reno4's 720G will likely remain cooler, but at the cost of some performance.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 20W and 30W truly significant in everyday use for the Mi 10 Lite 5G and Reno4?
Yes, the 30W charging on the Reno4 offers a substantial time saving. While 20W is still reasonably fast, 30W can add a significant percentage of battery life in just 10-15 minutes, making it ideal for users who need a quick boost before heading out. The Reno4's 50% charge in 20 minutes is a clear advantage.
❓ Given the similar endurance ratings, will I notice a real-world difference in battery life between the Mi 10 Lite 5G and the Reno4 with typical usage?
With typical usage, the difference in battery life will likely be minimal. Both phones are rated for 103 hours, suggesting comparable efficiency. However, your actual battery life will depend heavily on your usage patterns, such as screen brightness, app usage, and network connectivity.
