The Oppo Reno4 and Realme X50 Pro Player represent distinct approaches to the mid-to-high range smartphone market. The Reno4 prioritizes a sleek design and balanced features, while the X50 Pro Player aggressively targets performance with a flagship Snapdragon 865 chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro Player is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly faster performance, crucial for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Reno4 offers a more refined aesthetic, the X50 Pro Player’s raw power and 65W charging justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 29. Released 2020, August 05 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Galactic Blue, Space Black | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | CPH2113 | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 350 EUR |
Oppo Reno4
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Potentially more refined color science in photos
- Significantly slower performance than the X50 Pro Player
- Slower 30W charging
- Less capable GPU for gaming
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 865 performance
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Potentially more aggressive image processing
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, but based on their market positioning, we can infer differences. The X50 Pro Player, being a performance-focused device, likely features a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) panel for smoother visuals during gaming. The Reno4 likely prioritizes color accuracy and a more power-efficient display. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends. Without specific nit brightness data, it's difficult to definitively state which display is superior, but the X50 Pro Player's higher refresh rate is a significant advantage for gamers.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X50 Pro Player, positioned as a higher-end device, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more capable than the 720G’s, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. While both phones likely offer multiple lenses, the X50 Pro Player’s superior processing power will likely yield more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. The Reno4 may focus on a more natural color profile, while the X50 Pro Player might lean towards more saturated images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core versus the Reno4’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold cores – and a significantly more capable Adreno 650 GPU compared to the Adreno 618. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the X50 Pro Player. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Reno4’s 720G is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games at high settings.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 Pro Player’s 65W SuperDart charging is a game-changer, achieving a 100% charge in just 35 minutes. The Oppo Reno4’s 30W VOOC charging, while respectable, is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the X50 Pro Player’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 7nm+ process of the Snapdragon 865 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Reno4’s advantage in display efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 if you prioritize a lighter, more aesthetically pleasing device and your primary use cases are social media, casual browsing, and photography where extreme processing power isn't essential. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you are a gamer, power user, or frequently engage in resource-intensive tasks like video editing, and demand the fastest possible performance and rapid charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Oppo Reno4 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphical settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering, especially during intense combat sequences. The X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 will handle Genshin Impact at high settings with ease.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme X50 Pro Player compared to the 30W charging on the Oppo Reno4 in real-world usage?
The 65W charging on the X50 Pro Player can fully charge the device in approximately 35 minutes, while the Reno4’s 30W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour. This means you can quickly top up your X50 Pro Player during short breaks, making it ideal for users who are constantly on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the Realme X50 Pro Player generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 865 can generate heat under sustained load, the X50 Pro Player likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate throttling. The 7nm+ process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency compared to older flagship chipsets. However, expect some degree of warmth during extended gaming sessions.
