Oppo Reno4 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G, and the 65W charging is significantly faster. However, the Reno4 remains a compelling option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 29. Released 2020, August 05 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Blue, Space Black | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | CPH2113 | KB2007 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 640 EUR |
Oppo Reno4
- More affordable price point
- Sleek and stylish design
- Capable for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speed
- Less capable camera system
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Enhanced camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- May not be as readily available in all markets
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand history), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G will handle display tasks efficiently, but the 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 offers headroom for more demanding graphical output. We expect the 8T+ to have a higher peak brightness, resulting in better visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels are likely comparable, given both brands’ focus on maximizing screen real estate. Color accuracy is expected to be good on both, but the 8T+’s more powerful GPU could enable wider color gamut support.
Camera Comparison
Without specific sensor details, we can infer differences based on the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP). The Snapdragon 865’s ISP is far more advanced, enabling faster image processing, better dynamic range, and improved low-light performance. The 8T+ 5G is likely to capture sharper, more detailed photos and videos. While both phones may feature multiple rear cameras, the Reno4’s image processing will be limited by its chipset. We anticipate the 8T+ 5G to offer superior video stabilization and potentially support for higher resolution video recording. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the 8T+ 5G would further enhance image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84GHz versus the Reno4’s Kryo 465 Gold at 2.3GHz. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 865 also boasts a significantly more capable Adreno 650 GPU. While both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the 865’s architecture is optimized for faster data throughput. The Reno4 is adequate for everyday use, but the 8T+ 5G is built for power users.
Battery Life
The charging speed is a defining factor. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 39 minutes, a massive advantage over the Reno4’s 30W charging, which takes 20 minutes to reach 50%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 8T+ 5G mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 865’s 7nm+ process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting some of the power draw from its higher performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 if you need a stylish, capable smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you demand smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, a more responsive gaming experience, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it comes at a higher cost.