Oppo Reno4 vs Motorola Edge 70: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 70 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift and improved thermal management compared to the Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G. The Edge 70’s significantly faster 68W charging and wireless charging capabilities further solidify its advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 | Motorola Edge 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 29. Released 2020, August 05 | 2025, October 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 74 x 6 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 722 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Blue, Space Black | Pantone: Gadget Gray, Lily Pad, Bronze Green |
| Models | CPH2113 | XT2601-2, XT2603-2 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | £ 799.00 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 50:14h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo Reno4
- Potentially lower price point
- Established brand reputation
- Competent all-around performance for basic tasks
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 720G)
- Slower charging speeds (30W)
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 70
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- Significantly faster 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Longer battery life and 1000 charge cycle claim
- Potentially higher price
- Motorola’s software update track record is sometimes inconsistent
- May lack some of the brand recognition of Oppo
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the Reno4’s release timeframe, it likely features a standard 60Hz AMOLED panel. The Edge 70, being newer, likely boasts a higher refresh rate (potentially 144Hz) AMOLED display, offering smoother scrolling and animations. Motorola often prioritizes color accuracy, so the Edge 70 likely has a wider color gamut coverage. Bezels are expected to be slimmer on the Edge 70 due to its more recent design.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, meaning the Edge 70 likely employs more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Reno4’s camera performance is adequate, but the Edge 70’s newer ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 should deliver improved dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The absence of information on sensor sizes makes a definitive statement impossible, but a larger sensor on the Edge 70 would be expected given its positioning.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 70’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Oppo Reno4’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 4nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. The Edge 70’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 prime core alongside 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 cores and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 cores – is architecturally superior to the Reno4’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver setup. This means faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Edge 70. While both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the Edge 70’s more efficient chipset will allow it to better utilize available memory.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 70’s battery endurance of 50:14h and active use score of 13:36h significantly surpasses what the Reno4 likely offers. While the Reno4’s 30W charging is respectable, the Edge 70’s 68W wired charging is dramatically faster, allowing for a full charge in under an hour. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the Edge 70 provides added convenience, a feature absent on the Reno4. The Edge 70’s battery also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, suggesting long-term durability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 if you prioritize a familiar, well-established brand and are seeking a capable all-rounder at a potentially lower price point. It’s a solid choice for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Motorola Edge 70 if you value performance, fast charging, and a more modern chipset. It’s ideal for users who multitask frequently, enjoy mobile gaming, and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging.