Oppo Reno4 vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software support, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the better choice. Its superior image processing and guaranteed updates outweigh the Reno4’s faster charging. However, users who frequently need a quick power boost will appreciate the Reno4’s 30W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 29. Released 2020, August 05 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Blue, Space Black | Mostly Black |
| Models | CPH2113 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 330 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4
- Significantly faster 30W charging
- Sleek and modern design aesthetic
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Snapdragon 765G
- Likely inferior camera image processing
- Uncertainty regarding long-term software support
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Superior camera performance thanks to Google’s software
- Guaranteed software updates and security patches
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Less emphasis on design flair
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 861 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the Reno4. This makes the Pixel 5a far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the Pixel 5a provides a more vibrant and visually appealing experience. The Reno4’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower peak brightness and less impressive outdoor visibility. We can infer that the Reno4 likely uses an AMOLED panel, common for the price point, but lacks the Pixel 5a’s superior luminance.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are limited, the Pixel 5a 5G’s strength lies in Google’s computational photography prowess. The Pixel series is renowned for its image processing, delivering excellent dynamic range and detail, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Reno4’s camera system, while likely capable, relies more on hardware specifications without the same level of software optimization. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Reno4 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 5a’s software advantage is a significant differentiator. We can assume the Reno4 includes standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Pixel 5a’s implementation will likely be superior.
Performance
At the heart of the Reno4 lies the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm), while the Pixel 5a 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 7nm process node of the 765G generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained loads. The Pixel 5a’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – offers a slight edge in single-core performance over the Reno4’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver. While both phones are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Pixel 5a’s chipset provides a more future-proofed experience, particularly for demanding applications and 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno4 and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, they differ significantly in charging speed. The Reno4 supports 30W wired charging, claiming a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, while the Pixel 5a 5G is limited to 18W wired charging with PD2.0. This means the Reno4 can replenish its battery much faster, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need a quick top-up. Despite the slower charging, the Pixel 5a’s efficient chipset and software optimization contribute to its comparable endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 if you need exceptionally fast charging and a design-focused aesthetic. It’s ideal for users who are constantly on the go and need to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prioritize camera performance, clean software, and long-term software support. This phone is perfect for photography enthusiasts and those who value a streamlined Android experience.