Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Realme X50 5G: Which 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially more consistent performance, the Realme X50 5G is the better choice. Its 30W charging significantly outperforms the Reno4 Z 5G’s 18W, and the Snapdragon 765G generally offers a more refined software experience, despite the Dimensity 800’s theoretical CPU advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 Z 5G | Realme X50 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.5 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, October 15 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Black, Dew White | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | CPH2065 | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 78h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1284:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.1 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 295562 (v8) GeekBench: 2196 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
- Potentially longer battery endurance (78h rating)
- Dimensity 800 offers strong CPU performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive price point
- Slow 18W charging
- Less refined software experience compared to Qualcomm
- Limited display brightness
Realme X50 5G
- 30W fast charging (70% in 30 min)
- Snapdragon 765G offers better gaming performance
- Qualcomm’s established software ecosystem
- Battery endurance rating unavailable
- Potentially less efficient CPU compared to Dimensity 800 in specific scenarios
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays adequate for their price points, but detailed specifications are limited. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G boasts a contrast ratio of 1284:1 and a measured peak brightness of 398 nits. While acceptable, this brightness level may struggle in direct sunlight. The Realme X50 5G’s display specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Realme typically prioritizes vibrant colors and high refresh rates in this segment, which the Reno4 Z 5G doesn’t explicitly advertise. The Reno4 Z’s contrast ratio suggests a standard IPS panel, while the X50 5G may offer a more visually engaging experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to assess camera quality. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on multi-camera setups with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced stabilization. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Oppo often favoring more saturated colors and Realme leaning towards a more natural look. The lack of detail makes a definitive camera comparison impossible.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Realme X50 5G is powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7nm), with an octa-core CPU configuration of 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. While the Dimensity 800’s Cortex-A76 cores offer strong single-core performance, the Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core is often more efficient and delivers more consistent performance under sustained loads. Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU generally outperforms the Mali-G52 MC4 found in the Dimensity 800, making the X50 5G a better choice for mobile gaming.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G has an endurance rating of 78 hours, indicating respectable battery life. However, its 18W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Realme X50 5G lacks an official endurance rating, but its 30W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% in 30 minutes, provides a significant advantage. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity differences, making the X50 5G more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their devices. The Reno4 Z 5G’s slower charging speed will require longer periods plugged into a power source.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G if you prioritize endurance and a potentially smoother experience in less demanding tasks, benefiting from the Dimensity 800’s efficient core design. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you value rapid charging, a more established software ecosystem with Qualcomm, and a chipset known for its gaming capabilities, even if it means slightly less theoretical CPU horsepower.