Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Google Pixel 4a 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software support and camera consistency, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is the better choice. However, users who heavily utilize their phones for demanding tasks and value extended battery life will find the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 Z 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.5 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, October 15 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Black, Dew White | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | CPH2065 | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 78h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1284:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.1 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 295562 (v8) GeekBench: 2196 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
- Exceptional battery endurance (78h rating)
- Potentially stronger multi-core performance with Dimensity 800
- Higher contrast ratio for immersive viewing
- Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel
- Camera performance relies heavily on Oppo’s processing
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- Guaranteed software updates and clean Android experience
- Excellent camera performance with Google’s computational photography
- PD2.0 support for potentially faster charging
- Battery life may be shorter than Reno4 Z 5G
- Snapdragon 765G may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones offer adequate displays for their price points, but differ in key areas. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G boasts a 1284:1 contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks, though this is a nominal figure. It achieves a measured peak brightness of 398 nits, which is acceptable for indoor use but may struggle in direct sunlight. The Pixel 4a 5G’s display specifications are less readily available, but Pixel displays generally prioritize color accuracy. The Reno4 Z’s contrast ratio gives it an edge in media consumption, while the Pixel likely excels in color fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable cameras, but approach image processing differently. The Pixel 4a 5G is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s algorithms to produce consistently excellent images with minimal user input. While specific sensor details for the Reno4 Z 5G are unavailable, Oppo typically focuses on high-resolution sensors and versatile camera modes. The Pixel’s strength lies in its dynamic range and low-light performance, while the Reno4 Z may offer more creative flexibility. The Pixel’s software processing is a significant advantage, consistently delivering pleasing results.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a mix of Cortex-A76 and A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Google Pixel 4a 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm), with a Kryo 475 CPU configuration – a prime core at 2.4 GHz, a gold core at 2.2 GHz, and six silver cores at 1.8 GHz. The Snapdragon 765G’s prime core offers a higher clock speed, potentially leading to snappier single-core performance. However, the Dimensity 800’s architecture is designed for efficient multi-core workloads. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization, but the Snapdragon 765G benefits from Qualcomm’s established gaming optimizations.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G claims an impressive endurance rating of 78 hours, suggesting superior battery life. While mAh capacity isn’t specified, this rating indicates efficient power management. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 4a 5G adds PD2.0 support for potentially faster charging with compatible chargers. The Reno4 Z’s higher endurance rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day of heavy use, while the Pixel 4a 5G may require a top-up depending on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G if you need exceptional battery endurance and prioritize raw processing power for tasks like video editing or demanding mobile games. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prefer a clean, streamlined software experience with guaranteed updates, and a consistently excellent camera that requires minimal effort to achieve great results.