Both the Oppo Reno4 SE and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but they take distinctly different approaches to performance and charging. The Reno4 SE prioritizes a sleek design and efficient chipset, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro aims for raw power with a more advanced processor. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Reno4 SE’s Dimensity 720, and the 67W charging is faster, despite similar 0-100% times. The Reno4 SE remains a viable option for those seeking a more streamlined experience and potentially better power efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 24 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | PEAT00, PEAM00 | - |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo Reno4 SE
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the Dimensity 720.
- Sleek design and potentially lighter weight (assumed).
- Competitive 65W fast charging.
- Significantly less powerful chipset compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
- Lower gaming performance.
- Less future-proofed for demanding applications.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Much faster Dimensity 1100 chipset for superior performance.
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 support.
- Enhanced gaming capabilities.
- Potentially lower battery life due to the more powerful processor.
- MIUI software can be polarizing.
- May run warmer under sustained load.
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality will be similar, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s superior GPU will translate to smoother frame rates in games and demanding visual applications. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a factor not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s chipset has a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Reno4 SE’s ISP is adequate for everyday photography, but will struggle to match the Redmi Note 10 Pro in complex scenarios. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light stills. We can assume both phones include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processing power allows for more sophisticated computational photography features.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a significant leap over the Reno4 SE’s 7nm Dimensity 720. The 1100 boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the Reno4 SE’s two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to approximately 25-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The GPU upgrade is equally substantial, offering a noticeable improvement in gaming performance. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s likely use of faster LPDDR4X RAM further enhances responsiveness. Thermal management will be crucial; the 6nm node of the Dimensity 1100 should offer better efficiency, but sustained loads will still generate heat.
Battery Life
Both devices offer impressive fast charging capabilities – 67W for the Redmi Note 10 Pro and 65W for the Reno4 SE. While the Redmi Note 10 Pro advertises a full charge in 42 minutes, the Reno4 SE’s charging time is not specified. The actual difference in real-world usage will depend on battery capacity (not provided), but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s more efficient chipset could offset a slightly smaller battery, resulting in comparable all-day battery life. The Redmi Note 10 Pro also supports PD3.0, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 SE if you need a phone with a focus on efficient daily tasks and appreciate a potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and faster overall performance, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 1100 is capable of running Genshin Impact at high settings with playable frame rates. While you may need to adjust graphics settings for optimal performance, the chipset’s GPU is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 720 in the Reno4 SE, providing a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, but some heat generation is inevitable during extended gaming. Xiaomi likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but sustained high frame rates will still cause the device to warm up. The Reno4 SE, with its less powerful chipset, will likely run cooler.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 65W and 67W noticeable in real-world use?
The difference of 2W is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in everyday charging. Both phones offer incredibly fast charging, and the advertised 42-minute full charge for the Redmi Note 10 Pro is comparable to what you’d expect from the Reno4 SE’s 65W charging.
