The Oppo Reno4 SE and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balance of features and performance without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally responsive experience, the Oppo Reno4 SE emerges as the winner. Its 65W charging significantly outperforms the Mi 10T Lite’s 33W, and the Dimensity 720 provides adequate performance for daily tasks and moderate gaming. However, the Mi 10T Lite’s slightly more efficient Snapdragon 750G and comparable battery endurance make it a strong contender for those focused on maximizing battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 24 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 214.5 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.0 | 64GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.1
128GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Atlantic Blue, Pearl Gray, Rose Gold Beach |
| Models | PEAT00, PEAM00 | M2007J17G |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1368:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318882 (v8)
GeekBench: 2009 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 SE
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Competitive performance for the price
- Generally responsive user experience
- Less power-efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 750G
- Limited detailed camera specifications
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Slightly brighter display
- Comparable battery endurance
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower 33W charging
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno4 SE and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G share a contrast ratio of 1368:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Mi 10T Lite boasts a measured peak brightness of 596 nits, which will provide a more comfortable viewing experience in direct sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified, both likely utilize IPS LCDs given their price points. Bezels are comparable, and without detailed color accuracy data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner in terms of overall display quality, though the Mi 10T Lite’s brightness gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a 'Photo / Video' experience, but specifics are lacking. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on primary sensors in the 48MP-64MP range. The Snapdragon 750G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially leading to more detailed and dynamic photos on the Mi 10T Lite. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it impossible to assess low-light performance differences. We can assume both will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality will depend heavily on software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno4 SE utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm) while the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The Snapdragon 750G, built on a more efficient 8nm process, generally offers slightly better sustained performance and thermal management. The CPU configuration of the Mi 10T Lite (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) also provides a clock speed advantage over the Reno4 SE’s (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking on the Mi 10T Lite. However, the difference isn’t massive, and the Reno4 SE remains capable for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno4 SE’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the battery in approximately 35-40 minutes. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes significantly longer – around 1 hour and 15 minutes to reach 100%. The Reno4 SE also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Mi 10T Lite, allowing it to top up accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 SE if you need blazing-fast charging speeds and a phone that can quickly top up between uses. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves with low battery and need a rapid solution. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G if you prioritize maximizing battery life and prefer a slightly more power-efficient chipset, even if it means slower charging. This phone is better suited for users who want a phone that can comfortably last a full day on a single charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 720 in the Oppo Reno4 SE struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Dimensity 720 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve consistently smooth frame rates. The Snapdragon 750G in the Mi 10T Lite offers a slight advantage in sustained gaming performance due to its more efficient 8nm process, potentially allowing for higher settings without significant throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Oppo Reno4 SE compared to the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the Reno4 SE can fully charge the battery in approximately 35-40 minutes, while the 33W charging on the Mi 10T Lite takes around 1 hour and 15 minutes. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a much shorter time with the Reno4 SE, making it ideal for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of OIS on either phone a significant drawback for taking photos in low-light conditions?
The absence of OIS is noticeable in low-light photography. Without OIS, the camera relies more on software stabilization, which can sometimes result in blurry images or increased noise. While both phones likely have night modes to compensate, the results won't be as consistently sharp as those from phones with OIS.
