Oppo Reno4 SE vs Realme X7 Pro Ultra: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X7 Pro Ultra is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1000+ chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Reno4 SE’s Dimensity 720, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience. While both offer 65W charging, the X7 Pro Ultra’s faster processor justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 SE | Realme X7 Pro Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 24 | 2021, April 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, Aurora |
| Models | PEAT00, PEAM00 | RMX3115 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Oppo Reno4 SE
- More affordable price point
- Fast 65W charging
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially limited gaming performance
- Likely a 60Hz display
Realme X7 Pro Ultra
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1000+ processor
- Likely 120Hz AMOLED display
- Improved gaming performance
- Potentially better camera system
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful processor
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Reno4 SE's positioning, it likely features a 60Hz AMOLED panel. The X7 Pro Ultra, being a more premium offering, likely boasts a 120Hz AMOLED display. This higher refresh rate on the X7 Pro Ultra would result in significantly smoother scrolling and animations, benefiting users who frequently browse social media or play fast-paced games. Bezels are likely comparable, but the X7 Pro Ultra may have slightly thinner bezels due to its higher price point. Color accuracy is expected to be good on both, typical of AMOLED technology.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the X7 Pro Ultra, being the higher-end device, likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and night mode, the image processing capabilities of the Dimensity 1000+’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) are more advanced, potentially leading to more detailed and accurate images. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the X7 Pro Ultra would be a significant advantage for video recording and reducing blur in low-light photos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X7 Pro Ultra’s Dimensity 1000+ utilizes a more advanced CPU configuration – four Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the Reno4 SE’s two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speed, translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The GPU in the Dimensity 1000+ is also significantly more powerful, offering a better gaming experience. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the X7 Pro Ultra’s superior chipset will be less bottlenecked by memory bandwidth. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 1000+ generates more heat, requiring a more robust cooling solution, which Realme likely implemented.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 65W wired charging, capable of fully charging the battery in approximately 35 minutes (as stated for the X7 Pro Ultra). The actual battery capacity isn't specified, but the X7 Pro Ultra’s more powerful processor will consume more power. Therefore, while charging speeds are identical, the Reno4 SE may offer slightly longer battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the X7 Pro Ultra’s faster processing allows for quicker task completion, potentially offsetting some of the battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 SE if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging and are on a strict budget, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over raw power. Buy the Realme X7 Pro Ultra if you prefer a more responsive and capable device for gaming, demanding apps, and future-proofing, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeable performance improvement.