The Realme X50 Pro Player and Oppo Reno4 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-to-high range smartphone market. The X50 Pro Player, leveraging the Snapdragon 865, aims for near-flagship performance at a competitive price. Conversely, the Reno4 Pro focuses on a balanced experience, prioritizing battery life and a refined user experience with the Snapdragon 720G. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Realme X50 Pro Player is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly more processing power. However, if extended battery life and a consistently smooth experience are paramount, the Oppo Reno4 Pro’s 96-hour endurance rating makes it a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia Pacific | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 31. Released 2020, August 05 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Night, Silky White | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | CPH2109 | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 96h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.8 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 261359 (v8)
GeekBench: 1781 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno4 Pro
- Exceptional 96-hour battery life
- Fast 65W charging (100% in 36 mins)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Snapdragon 720G is less powerful than Snapdragon 865
- Display lacks high refresh rate
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Supports 5G connectivity
- Likely shorter battery life than Reno4 Pro
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
Both devices offer a modern smartphone display experience, but differ in underlying power. The Oppo Reno4 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 843 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright conditions. While the Realme X50 Pro Player’s display specs aren’t provided, Realme typically prioritizes high refresh rates in this series, which the Reno4 Pro lacks. The Reno4 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED panel, delivering deep blacks. The absence of LTPO technology in either device means they won’t dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving like some newer flagships.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the Realme X50 Pro Player, being positioned as a 'Player' edition, likely prioritizes camera features geared towards content creation and gaming livestreaming. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 720G’s, enabling better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The absence of details suggests neither phone features a particularly groundbreaking camera system, relying more on software optimization than cutting-edge hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a significant leap over the Oppo Reno4 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the 720G’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver. This translates to substantially faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X50 Pro Player. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though both devices will likely experience throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno4 Pro’s standout feature is its 96-hour endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Realme X50 Pro Player’s battery capacity is unspecified, its more powerful chipset will inevitably consume more power. Both devices support 65W wired charging, with the Reno4 Pro achieving 60% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. The X50 Pro Player reaches 100% in 35 minutes. The Reno4 Pro’s longer overall endurance, despite similar charging speeds, makes it the better choice for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Pro if you need exceptional battery life and a reliable daily driver for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Its 96-hour endurance rating ensures you won't be constantly searching for a charger. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. The Snapdragon 865 provides the horsepower for intensive tasks and supports 5G connectivity, offering a more versatile and powerful experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Oppo Reno4 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 720G is capable, Genshin Impact and similar graphically intensive games will likely require reduced graphics settings and may experience occasional frame drops on the Reno4 Pro. The X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 will handle these games with significantly more headroom.
❓ Does the Realme X50 Pro Player overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While the X50 Pro Player likely incorporates thermal management solutions, some throttling is expected during extended gaming sessions. However, the 7nm+ process node is more efficient than older 7nm chips, mitigating the issue somewhat.
❓ Is the 65W charging on both phones compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
The Realme X50 Pro Player explicitly supports PD charging, offering greater compatibility with a wider range of chargers. The Oppo Reno4 Pro’s charging compatibility isn’t specified, but Oppo’s SuperVOOC charging typically requires a proprietary charger for optimal speeds.
