Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. The Reno4 Pro and Reno5 4G are both strong contenders, but which one offers the best overall experience? We're diving deep into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno4 Pro edges out the Reno5 4G thanks to its significantly faster charging and brighter display. While both share the same chipset, the Reno4 Pro's superior charging speed and screen brightness make it the more compelling choice for most users, despite the Reno5's potential price advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia Pacific | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 31. Released 2020, August 05 | 2020, December 31 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Night, Silky White | Galactic Silver (Fantasy Silver), Starlight Black (Starry Black) |
| Models | CPH2109 | CPH2159 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 96h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.8 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 261359 (v8)
GeekBench: 1781 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno4 Pro
- Faster 65W Charging
- Brighter Display (843 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (96h Endurance)
- Potentially better image processing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Snapdragon 720G isn't flagship performance
Oppo Reno5 4G
- Potentially more affordable
- Sleeker design possible
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower 50W Charging
- Likely less bright display
- Slightly shorter battery life (estimated)
Display Comparison
The Reno4 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, measuring 843 nits peak brightness compared to the Reno5 4G's likely lower brightness (typical of the Reno5 series). Both feature OLED panels, offering excellent contrast and vibrant colors. The Reno4 Pro's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' for the Reno4 Pro, indicating a very high contrast.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed, but both phones are expected to offer a versatile camera system with multiple lenses. The Reno4 Pro likely has slightly improved image processing due to potential software optimizations. Both phones should deliver good quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G chipset and the same Octa-core CPU. Performance will be largely similar in everyday tasks and most games. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either device, but they are capable of handling most user needs.
Battery Life
This is where the Reno4 Pro truly shines. It boasts a remarkable endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The 65W wired charging is incredibly fast, reaching 60% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. The Reno5 4G offers 50W charging, taking 48 minutes to reach 100%, a noticeable difference.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno4 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display. It's a great choice for those who frequently consume media and want a phone that can quickly power up. The Oppo Reno5 4G is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who don't mind slightly slower charging and a less bright screen, and appreciate a potentially sleeker design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 720G good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 720G is decent for casual gaming, but don't expect to play demanding titles at high settings. It's more suited for everyday tasks and less intensive games.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno4 Pro has a significantly better endurance rating (96h) and faster charging, making it the clear winner in the battery department.
