Google Pixel 5a 5G vs Oppo Reno4 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a streamlined software experience, the Google Pixel 5a 5G emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior battery endurance (122h vs 96h) and efficient Snapdragon 765G chipset outweigh the Reno4 Pro’s faster charging, making it the more practical daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 Pro | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia Pacific | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 31. Released 2020, August 05 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Night, Silky White | Mostly Black |
| Models | CPH2109 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 96h | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261359 (v8) GeekBench: 1781 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Slightly brighter display (843 nits)
- Sleek design (based on brand reputation)
- Inferior battery life (96h endurance)
- Less efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Exceptional battery life (122h endurance)
- More efficient Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Clean and updated Android experience
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Slightly less bright display (861 nits)
- Less emphasis on design flair
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno4 Pro and Google Pixel 5a 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the Pixel 5a 5G edges out the Reno4 Pro with a measured peak brightness of 861 nits compared to the Reno4 Pro’s 843 nits, offering slightly better visibility in direct sunlight. While the difference is subtle, it’s noticeable. Both phones lack high refresh rate displays, focusing instead on power efficiency. The Reno4 Pro’s display, while bright, doesn’t benefit from any advanced panel technology like LTPO, which the Pixel 5a 5G also lacks, meaning neither offers adaptive refresh rate capabilities.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but Google’s computational photography prowess gives the Pixel 5a 5G an edge. While detailed sensor specs are not provided, Google’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range and accurate color reproduction. The Reno4 Pro likely focuses on a more vibrant, potentially oversaturated look, typical of Oppo’s image processing style. The absence of information regarding sensor size makes a direct comparison difficult, but Google’s software optimizations often compensate for hardware limitations. The Reno4 Pro’s camera is described as capable for both photo and video, but without specifics, it’s hard to assess its strengths beyond that.
Performance
The Google Pixel 5a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) represents a step up in process technology compared to the Oppo Reno4 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 7nm node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with similar Kryo Silver cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, the Pixel 5a 5G boasts a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance advantage in single-core tasks. The Reno4 Pro has two Kryo 465 Gold cores at 2.3 GHz. This difference, combined with the more efficient process node, means the Pixel 5a 5G will likely sustain performance for longer under load, reducing the risk of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 5a 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, absent in the Reno4 Pro.
Battery Life
The most significant difference lies in battery endurance. The Google Pixel 5a 5G achieves an impressive 122-hour endurance rating, significantly surpassing the Oppo Reno4 Pro’s 96-hour rating. This translates to a substantial real-world advantage for the Pixel 5a 5G, allowing for multi-day usage on a single charge. While the Reno4 Pro boasts incredibly fast 65W wired charging (60% in 15 minutes, 100% in 36 minutes), the Pixel 5a 5G’s 18W charging, while slower, is less critical given its superior battery life. The Pixel 5a 5G’s efficiency minimizes the need for frequent top-ups, making the slower charging speed less of a drawback.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Pro if you absolutely need the fastest possible wired charging and prioritize a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you value exceptional battery life, a clean and consistently updated Android experience, and a more efficient processor that balances performance with power consumption. This is the phone for users who want to minimize charging frequency and enjoy Google’s software features.