Oppo Reno4 Pro vs. iPhone 11 Pro Max: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a polished software experience, the iPhone 11 Pro Max remains a strong choice, despite its age. However, the Oppo Reno4 Pro delivers exceptional value with its blazing-fast 65W charging and comparable battery endurance, making it ideal for users who prioritize convenience and rapid power-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno4 Pro | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66 - A2218 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE 1.6 Gbps DL, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia Pacific | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - A2161, A2220 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 31. Released 2020, August 05 | 2019, September 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2019, September 20 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Corning-made glass), glass back (Corning-made glass), stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 158 x 77.8 x 8.1 mm (6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 4m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1242 x 2688 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Hexa-core (2x2.65 GHz Lightning + 4x1.8 GHz Thunder) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Apple A13 Bionic (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | iOS 13, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 512GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min Wireless (Qi) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 3969 mAh, non-removable (15.04 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Night, Silky White | Matte Space Gray, Matte Silver, Matte Gold, Matte Midnight Green |
| Models | CPH2109 | A2218, A2161, A2220, iPhone12,5 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 233.00 / C$ 369.75 / £ 226.95 / € 249.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 874.46 |
| 512GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 1,004.31 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 435.00 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 485.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -94.3dB / Crosstalk -81.5dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 96h | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261359 (v8) GeekBench: 1781 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 459713 (v7), 536883 (v8) GeekBench: 13870 (v4.4), 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Excellent battery endurance (96h)
- Potentially brighter display (843 nits)
- Modern design aesthetic
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 720G)
- Camera performance may lag behind iPhone
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
- Powerful A13 Bionic chip
- Excellent camera system with natural image processing
- Long-term software support and ecosystem integration
- Strong resale value
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher price point
- Older design
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno4 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max boast 'Infinite' contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. However, the Reno4 Pro edges out the iPhone with a measured peak brightness of 843 nits compared to the iPhone’s 820 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Reno4 Pro’s slightly brighter display and potentially higher PWM dimming rate (data unavailable, but common in Oppo phones) could be beneficial for users sensitive to flicker. The iPhone 11 Pro Max, however, benefits from Apple’s color calibration, ensuring highly accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are capable of capturing high-quality photos and videos, but their approaches differ. Without detailed sensor information for the Reno4 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is known for its natural image processing and excellent video stabilization. The Reno4 Pro likely focuses on computational photography to enhance image quality, a common strategy for mid-range devices. The iPhone’s advantage lies in its consistent performance across all lenses and its superior video recording capabilities. The Reno4 Pro’s camera system, while likely competent, may struggle in low-light conditions compared to the iPhone’s larger sensors and advanced image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iPhone 11 Pro Max’s Apple A13 Bionic, built on a 7nm+ process, consistently outperforms the Oppo Reno4 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The A13’s hexa-core architecture (2x2.65 GHz Lightning + 4x1.8 GHz Thunder) delivers superior single-core and multi-core performance. While the Snapdragon 720G’s octa-core configuration (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) is capable, it’s geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. This translates to smoother multitasking and more demanding app performance on the iPhone. The iPhone’s 4GB of RAM is sufficient due to Apple’s efficient memory management, but the Reno4 Pro’s RAM capacity is not specified, potentially impacting sustained performance in memory-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices offer impressive battery life, with endurance ratings of 102 hours for the iPhone 11 Pro Max and 96 hours for the Oppo Reno4 Pro. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The Reno4 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 60% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 36 minutes. The iPhone 11 Pro Max, with its slower wired charging (PD2.0) taking 30 minutes for 50%, and the addition of Qi wireless charging, simply can’t compete in terms of speed. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Pro if you need incredibly fast charging, prioritize battery endurance over absolute peak performance, and appreciate a more modern design aesthetic. Buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max if you prefer a seamless ecosystem, a proven track record of software updates, and a consistently smooth user experience, even if it means slower charging speeds and a higher initial investment.