The Oppo Reno4 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware and overall approach. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo Reno4 Lite’s Helio P95, despite the Reno4 Lite’s faster 30W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.7 x 7.4 mm (6.30 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Matte Black | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | CPH2125 | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318117 (v8)
GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno4 Lite
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lighter software experience (depending on ColorOS version)
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Inferior chipset performance (Helio P95)
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Limited long-term software support likely
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Better 5G modem and connectivity
- Superior battery endurance (103h rating)
- Slower 20W charging
- Potentially more bloatware (depending on MIUI version)
- Price may be slightly higher depending on configuration
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G boasts a display capable of reaching 610 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage over what is typical for this price range, ensuring better visibility outdoors. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the Mi 10 Lite’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. Oppo does not provide brightness data, so a direct comparison is difficult, but the Mi 10 Lite appears to have the edge.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. However, the Mi 10 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm ISP (Image Signal Processor) integrated within the Snapdragon 765G generally offers more advanced image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Reno4 Lite may focus on software-driven enhancements, but the Mi 10 Lite’s hardware advantage likely provides a more robust foundation for image quality. The lack of detail on both sides makes a detailed camera comparison impossible without hands-on testing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a substantial architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno4 Lite’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo 475 CPU architecture – with a prime core clocked at 2.4GHz – delivers superior single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. The Reno4 Lite’s Helio P95, while capable, is simply outmatched in terms of raw processing power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G achieves an impressive endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting excellent battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified). The Oppo Reno4 Lite’s battery capacity is also unknown, but its 30W wired charging is faster than the Mi 10 Lite 5G’s 20W charging, reaching 50% in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. However, the Mi 10 Lite 5G supports PD3.0 and QC4 standards, offering broader compatibility with fast chargers. The Mi 10 Lite’s superior endurance suggests better power efficiency from the Snapdragon 765G chipset, offsetting the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno4 Lite if you prioritize fast charging and a lighter user interface, and are less concerned with demanding gaming or long-term software support. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you value a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and the benefits of Qualcomm’s 5G modem, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the Mi 10 Lite 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. Its Adreno 620 GPU provides a significant performance boost over the Helio P95’s GPU, resulting in a smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience. While not a flagship-level gaming experience, it’s more than adequate for most mobile gamers.
❓ How does the 20W charging on the Mi 10 Lite 5G compare to the 30W charging on the Reno4 Lite in real-world usage?
While the Reno4 Lite charges faster on paper, the Mi 10 Lite 5G’s superior battery efficiency means you’re less likely to need to charge it as frequently. The difference in charging time from 0-100% is approximately 23 minutes, but the Mi 10 Lite’s longer endurance often negates the need for such rapid top-ups.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Mi 10 Lite 5G truly useful, or is it just a marketing feature?
The usefulness of 5G depends on your location and carrier coverage. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s integrated 5G modem offers broader compatibility with 5G networks compared to solutions often found in similarly priced phones. If you live in an area with 5G coverage, the Mi 10 Lite 5G will provide significantly faster download and upload speeds.
